Hotel workers resoundingly back strike

San Francisco hotel workers voted Thursday to authorize their union leaders to call a strike if current negotiations do not result in a contract agreement.

Ninety-three percent, or 2,241, of The City’s hotel workers voted to strike, with only 158 voting against, according to Unite Here! Local 2 spokeswoman Valerie Lapin.

If the employees — including housekeepers, kitchen workers, food servers and bell staff — end up walking out on the job, it will be the second such strike in two years against a group of 13 hotels.

In September 2004, Local 2 set up a two-week strike. The hotels, bargaining together under the umbrella name of San Francisco Multi Employer Group, responded by locking out the 4,000-plus workers. The showdown lasted for more than six weeks, and ended only after Mayor Gavin Newsom intervened. The two sides never settled on a revised contract, which strategically may benefit Local 2.

According to Local 2 President Mike Casey, San Francisco’s local union has timed its new bargaining efforts alongside current contract negotiations for hotel workers in other cities, including Chicago, Toronto, Honolulu and Monterey.

“We think we have greater leverage at this point,” Casey said, adding that many of the hotels are part of national chains, giving them “a lot of power and a lot of clout.”

Ken Jacobs, the deputy chairman of UC Berkeley’s Center for Labor Research and Education, said that while the “hotels are leading the way” with the strategy of lining up contracts with other American unions, the expectation is that other unions will adopt similar tactics.

“National corporations have much deeper pockets and can withstand a regional strike,” Jacobs said. “In order to have a level playing field, unions are going to have to coordinate on a much broader level.”

The San Francisco hotels are not taking into consideration the negotiations in other cities, said Noah Griffin, a spokesman for the 13 hotels.

“We’re focused solely on the economic package andour workers in San Francisco,” he said. “We have enough on our hands negotiating a contract without paying attention to what’s going on in other cities.”

Although Griffin said he would not discuss the details of what’s being negotiated at the bargaining table, Local 2 representatives say the core issues that are being debated include wage increases, pension improvements, job security in the event a hotel is sold, workload reductions, union rights at other hotels and health benefits.

The hotel group has proposed a two-tiered health care package that would provide reduced benefits for newer employees, a proposal the union has rejected.

One of the union workers, Pedro Castillo, a part-time food server for the Hilton, said it wouldn’t be fair to new employers or in his best interest to approve the two-tiered system.

“I’m approaching retirement,” the 62-year-old worker said. “When I need them for my retirement benefits, they’ll say ‘wait a minute, you sold us out.’”

According to Casey, no timeline has been set for a strike, since the union’s goal is to hammer out an agreement this time.

The union and the hotel representatives have both agreed to meet every day until Labor Day.

San Francisco Chamber of Commerce President Steve Falk said that, after talking to both sides, he believes “a strong commitment” exists to avoid a strike.

With tourism being San Francisco’s No. 1 industry, a hotel strike would have a rippling negative impact throughout The City. According to San Francisco Convention and Visitors Bureau estimates, $30 million in convention-related revenue has been lost since 2004 due to the ongoing hotel labor struggles.

Contract talks

Among core issues being negotiated at the bargaining table:

» Health care: Hotels have offered a two-tiered system with reduced benefits for new employees

» Wages: Union is asking for future increases as well as additional retroactive pay, dating back to 2004 contract expiration date

» Pension: Union wants improved retirement benefits

» Union has asked for job security in the event a hotel is sold

» Workload reductions for some hotel positions, including maids

» Organizing rights if hotel owners acquire new hotels in San Francisco

<p>Source: Unite Here! Local 2

Bay Area NewsLocal

Just Posted

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Most Read