Half Moon Bay bailout bill takes a step closer to reality

Officials expressed cautious optimism Wednesday as a bill designed to rescue their city from financial strain squeaked through its first legislative hoop.

Last month, a deal between Charles “Chop” Keenan and the city was struck that would allow Half Moon Bay to avert paying the developer a $41 million court judgement.

The deal hinges on the passage of AB 1991, a special rescue bill proposed by Assemblymember Gene Mullin, D-South San Francisco. Members of the state Assembly’s Local Government Committee voted 4-2 to pass the bill Wednesday.

Now, the bill will go before the Appropriations Committee, most likely on May 14 or 21. If it passes through that committee, it will go to the Assembly floor, said Sara Ramirez, chief of staff for Mullin.

“I’m really pleased that we got by step one,” said Half Moon Bay Mayor Bonnie McClung. “But I feel like even though I can be happy in the moment, there is a lot of work to do for AB 1991 to become law.”

If the bill is approved, it would allow the city to avoid paying Keenan $18 million by allowing him to build subdivisions on two properties containing wetlands, Beachwood and Glencree. If the bill fails, the city will have to pay Keenan the $18 million. The city has a $10 million yearly operating budget.

The legislation, however, has raised the ire of a number of environmental groups. State Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco/San Mateo, also dropped his co-sponsorship of the bill due to environmental concerns.

On Wednesday, Sierra Club of California Deputy Director Paul Mason said he was disappointed by the bill’s passage. He said it sets a dangerous precedent in which cities in financial trouble can flout environmental law.

“It’s always going to be easier to change the rules than to follow them,” Mason said. “When the Legislature decides to change the rules as political favors, that’s the beginning of the end for the fairness of rule of law in California.”

Both sides say they are gearing up for a tough fight.

“We’re already starting to decide how we’re going to present the bill in Appropriations,” Mullin said. “We didn’t have much wiggle room obviously. We needed four votes and we got four votes.”

Supporters of AB 1991 insist the bill won’t weaken environmental protections due to its specific language narrowly tailored to Beachwood’s specific circumstances.

tbarak@examiner.com  

Examiner Staff Writer Sasha Vasilyuk contributed to this report.

Bay Area NewsLocalPeninsula

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Tenderloin merchants, residents come together over street closures

Parts of Larkin, Golden Gate to close four days a week to promote outdoor business, dining

Enter ‘The Matrix’: Drive-in movies during a pandemic

Though it’s fun to take in a film and drink, I miss watching bartenders make cocktails

Twin Peaks closure leads to complaints from neighbors

Twin Peaks Boulevard will no longer be entirely closed to motor vehicles… Continue reading

David Kubrin on Marxism and magic in the Mission

Former academic, industrial designer pens book on alternative, or people’s, science

Fire danger high in North and East Bay as region enters another hot, dry weekend

Spare the Air Alert issued for Sunday as heat, smoke and fumes expected to increase

Most Read