Group seeks to pull measure requiring more police on streets

A coalition is attempting to derail the controversial November ballot measure that would add more police foot patrols citywide.

The Coalition for Civil Sidewalks — proponents of a sit-lie ordinance that’s also on the ballot — sent a letter to the Director of the Elections Department, John Arntz, asking that he pull Proposition M from the ballot — the measure that would require the captains of all 10 police stations to work with merchants and community members to establish specific foot beats.

The coalition claims the Board of Supervisors violated the San Francisco elections code when it added a “poison pill” to the measure, rushing to get it on the November ballot.

The “poison pill” the group is referring to is a provision that if the foot beat legislation receives more votes than Mayor Gavin Newsom’s ordinance to ban sitting and lying on city sidewalks, the sit-lie ordinance — known as Measure L — will be nullified.

In the letter, the coalition claims that on July 27, the board “ignored” advice from the City Attorney’s Office and voted to place Proposition M on the ballot with the new provision. According to the coalition, this move violated the elections code by not allowing for public review of the amended measure.

Arntz responded Tuesday saying he has only glanced at the letter, making no comment at this point.

“People take positions all the time in election matters; that doesn’t meant it’s the entire story,” Arntz said. “I have to talk to the City Attorney’s Office and get a sense of it and go from there. Right now I have no plan for or against what’s in the letter.”

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who sponsored the legislation, did not return phone calls Tuesday.

Mayor Gavin Newsom, who has been one of the sharpest critics of mandated foot patrols, said the coalition is raising a good point: Is this amendment legal?

“I think it’s a legitimate question,” Newsom said. “It’s about as crystal clear as it gets — what the Board of Supervisors did was outrageous, callous, transparent and so political.”

esherbert@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalPolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Construction in the Better Market Street Project between Fifth and Eighth streets is expected to break ground in mid-2021.<ins></ins>
SFMTA board to vote on Better Market Street changes

Agency seeks to make up for slimmed-down plan with traffic safety improvements

Golden State Warriors point guard Stephen Currey (30) tallied 26 points and seven assists at Monday night’s game against the Lakers. (Chris Victorio for the S.F. Examiner).
Warriors overcome 19-point deficit to stun defending-champion Lakers 115-113

Ladies and gentlemen, the Golden State Warriors are officially back. Stephen Curry… Continue reading

U.S. Vice President-elect Kamala Harris speaks during an event to name President-elect Joe Biden’s economic team at the Queen Theater on Dec. 1, 2020, in Wilmington, Del. (Alex Wong/Getty Images/TNS)
Kamala Harris to resign from Senate

Bridget Bowman CQ-Roll Call Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will resign from the… Continue reading

A view of Science Hall at the City College of San Francisco Ocean campus on Thursday, Jan. 14, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
CCSF begins search for next chancellor amid new challenges

‘It’s arguably the biggest single responsibility the board has,’ trustee says

Some people are concerned that University of California, San Francisco’s expansion at its Parnassus campus could cause an undesirable increase in the number of riders on Muni’s N-Judah line.<ins></ins>
Will UCSF’s $20 million pledge to SFMTA offset traffic woes?

An even more crowded N-Judah plus increased congestion ahead cause concern

Most Read