Frantz: So-called experts must let ‘non-issue’ go

The first column I wrote for this newspaper, some seven years ago believe it or not, was a tribute to the backspace key. That’s right, I spent 600-plus words paying homage to a little piece of plastic with a backwards-pointed arrow; the one right next to the “=” and “+” key on any standard keyboard. The one that couldn’t be more valuable if it were made of platinum.

Allow me to explain: We in the broadcasting industry spend our entire careers speaking. In any given 3- or 4-hour radio program, for example, we will spit out literally thousands of words. In just a single calendar year, a typical talk radio host will utter tens of millions of words to convey tens of thousands of thoughts. And if you were to ask any one of them what their single greatest fear is, every one of them would likely tell you it’s that one of those words will be their career-killer.

One single ill-chosen word, articulated without thinking and highlighted among the millions of others before and after it, can undo an entire career of respected broadcast journalism — if the wrong person is offended by it. It’s like walking a verbal tightrope without a net. Every step can be as sure and confident as the last, perfectly balanced, until the one fateful slip that renders all that preceded it meaningless.

Unless that word is written rather than spoken, of course. Then it can be quickly destroyed without any record of its existence by the best friend of every print journalist or columnist working today: the backspace key.

What’s the point, you ask? The point is this: It’s a shame that Kelly Tilghman didn’t have a backspace key.

Make no mistake about it, if Tilghman had been writing for Golf Digest instead of speaking on The Golf Channel, her name would not have been dragged through the media mud for the last week or so and the Rev. Al Sharpton wouldn’t have made her the most recent stop on his Victimization Tour of America.

And why? Because the moment she would have typed the “h” in the word “lynch”, she would have looked at it and thought to herself, “No, that’s not the right word!” And she would have hit that little backwards arrow five times, deleting her error forever.

Tilghman has been suspended for two weeks by The Golf Channel for her mistake, which was to follow Nick Faldo’s suggestion that the rest of the PGA field “gang up on” Tiger Woods with the phrase, “lynch him in a back alley.” The suspension has been accepted by some, but considered a slap on the wrist by many, who believe the commentator should have been fired.

Clearly, Tilghman’s comment was nothing more than a pained attempt at humor, as she played off the imagery painted by Faldo of a group of golfers ganging up on Woods to stop him from lapping the field again this season. Tiger himself acknowledged as much when he called the story, through an agent, a “non-issue.”

So why is it such an issue?

It’s an issue because columnists, sports-talkers and activists such as Sharpton (who has demanded her firing) want it to be. For the past five days I’ve read and listened to “expert” after “expert” condemn Tilghman’s “poor choice of words” which is one of the most ignorant statements ever. They make it appear as though she had a list of words in front of her, and that she took her time surveying it, and then chose the most offensive word on it.

“Hmmm, what can the other golfers do to stop Tiger? I know, they should take him out and LYNCH him! Yes, they should hang him! That’s it!”

Give me a break. Tilghman simply opened her mouth too quickly following Faldo’s “gang up” remark, and didn’t take the time to think about the words that were coming out of it. Had she a backspace key, the word would have disappeared as quickly as it came, because she knew it was an error.

But it was a simple error, not a malicious one. A forgivable error. That’s why Tiger forgave her. So should we.

Sports personality Bob Frantz is a regular contributor to The Examiner. E-mail him at

Bay Area Newssports

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Temporary high-occupancy vehicle lanes will be added to sections of state Highway 1 and U.S. Highway 101 through The City including Park Presidio Boulevard to help keep transit flowing as traffic increases. (Photo by Ekevara Kitpowsong/Special to S.F. Examiner)
Transit and high-occupancy vehicle lanes coming to some of The City’s busiest streets

Changes intended to improve transit reliability as traffic increases with reopening

Tents fill up a new safe camping site in a former parking lot at 180 Jones St. in the Tenderloin on Thursday, June 11, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Proposal for major expansion of safe sleeping sites gets cool reception in committee

Supervisor Mandelman calls for creation of more temporary shelter sites to get homeless off streets

Demonstrators commemorated the life of George Floyd and others killed by police outside S.F. City Hall on June 1, 2020.<ins></ins>
Chauvin verdict: SF reacts after jury finds ex-officer guilty on all charges

San Franciscans were relieved Tuesday after jurors found a former Minneapolis police… Continue reading

San Francisco Unified School District Board member Faauuga Moliga, right, pictured with Superintendent Vincent Matthews on the first day back to classrooms, will be board vice president for the remander of the 2121 term. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Faauuga Moliga named as school board vice president to replace Alison Collins

The San Francisco school board on Tuesday selected board member Fauuga Moliga… Continue reading

Legislation by Supervisor Rafael Mandelman would require The City to add enough new safe camping sites, such as this one at 180 Jones St. in the Tenderloin, to accomodate everyone living on the street. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
City would create sites for hundreds of tents under new homeless shelter proposal

Advocates say funding better spent on permanent housing

Most Read