Why does France have no problem shutting down interference in its presidential election while the U.S. just rolls right over? (Hadrian/Shutterstock)

France sets precedent for propaganda crackdown

Say it with me: Robots. Are. Not. People.

The Putinbots who were preemptively shut down in France leading up to Sunday’s election are really “unhappy” about France trampling all over their “rights” — like liberté, égalité and fraternité.

Fake people, visually represented by pillaged photos of actual people from the internet or sometimes cartoons or Twitter “eggs” — all created for the purpose of legitimizing and amplifying propaganda — are whining about their rights. “They” wanted to spread fake news and unleash the hacked emails from the campaign of Emmanuel Macron, France’s president-elect, but were shut down. Injuste!

“Amy Mek,” the Twitter profile I wrote about in March, is among the outraged.

Amy is having a fit about her Twitter account getting shut down in France, enlisting her claque of fellow fake accounts to amplify her outrage. (However, the account continues to spread racist hate and lies carte blanche in the U.S.) To no one’s surprise, Amy and her pals recently took up French politics, going all in for Marine Le Pen.

Quelle surprise!

So much interest, in fact, that Amy was tweeting about the French election like a turnt-up Russian cuckoo clock — until she was silenced.

France shut down her Twitter account like Russian Velveeta served up on a warm baguette. French officials warned the media and the public to not spread the hacked information against Macron. As in, if you do, you are breaking the law. And Facebook, on its own initiative, upped its game and took action against 30,000 propaganda accounts in France.

So why does France have no problem shutting down interference in its election while we just roll right over?

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s meddling in our election was a teachable moment for other countries. The Netherlands took no chances in its recent election and resorted to paper ballots. France had also seen what was in Putin’s bag of tricks and took precautions.

But France also didn’t worry over whether it might be tiptoeing onto someone’s rights by making and enforcing some ground rules. The country demanded restraint and meant it. France also had no problem asking Twitter to take action against accounts that violate its laws. In fact, France is one the top countries that requests Twitter take action on accounts. (See for yourself in this handy-dandy “transparency report,” which uses some fancy graphics and spreadsheets to show where Twitter shut things down.)

An estimated 19 percent of election-related Twitter traffic leading up to November’s U.S. Presidential Election was propaganda, including amplified fake news stories like “Pizzagate” — weaponized “information” designed to elect Donald Trump.

So before we decide everyone’s rights are getting trampled on with requests for standards, let’s get some perspective …

French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s ideas about freedom and autonomy helped inspire the French Revolution and helped lead to modern, inadequate, imperfect and messy democracies with elections and free speech. But I’m pretty sure that when Rousseau spoke of “the consent of the governed,” he wasn’t including robots programmed by Putin’s minions.

Modern French philosopher Jean Baudrillard said increasing use of symbols would ultimately destroy truth, calling it “the precession of the simulacra.” Basically, Baudrillard would say that, up until last week, Putin was laughing at how he was going to manipulate the French election — just like he did in the U.S. — by amplifying propaganda through obviously fake “people” mirroring each other via the internet.

But wait a minute: France practically invented modern democracy. And more recently, French philosophers have spent a disproportionate amount of time contemplating what’s real, what’s fake and how power is yielded. So how did France react to this insult?

France said to Putin, “We see you.”

Casse toi!

For Americans who — like me — treasure our First Amendment and have a knee-jerk reaction to efforts that limit free speech, consider this: Robots. Are. Not. People. They are pieces of a propaganda machine.

The robots are programmed to destabilize nations and weaken everyone’s rights and make him more powerful. And if this is the case, aren’t actual people — citizens, political leaders, those who actually operate social media companies — obligated to intervene? Start with acknowledging how Putin plays the game: exploiting our best instincts — openness and liberty — to sow dissent and destabilize our nations.

Perhaps we can follow France’s lead by seeing clearly and shutting this interference down. N’est-ce pas?

Maureen Erwin is a Bay Area political consultant. Most recently she led Sonoma County’s Measure M, which will create the largest GMO-free growing zone in the U.S.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Balboa Reservoir project wins approval from Board of Supervisors

Development will build 1,100 housing units on 17-acre parking lot near City College

Supervisors fear Tenderloin lawsuit settlement sets bad precedent

UC Hastings case pushed city to move more homeless residents into hotels or shelters

Sen. Kamala Harris chosen as Joe Biden’s running mate

Joe Biden has chosen Sen. Kamala Harris of California as his running… Continue reading

UCSF police seek suspect in killing at Inner Sunset campus

UC San Francisco police are investigating the death of a person who… Continue reading

Mayor Breed unveils $446.1 milion COVID-19 budget proposal

Mayor London Breed unveiled the budget proposal Tuesday for The City’s COVID-19… Continue reading

Most Read