Ken Williams, a police reform and use of force expert, speaks during a justice summit on the use of force at the San Francisco Public Library on Wednesday, May 25, 2016. (Ryan McNulty/Special to S.F. Examiner)

Former Massachusetts cop says SFPD needs to be accountable on reforms

As the San Francisco Police Department works to rewrite its use-of-force policies under a newly appointed interim chief, one former Massachusetts cop says for those policies to become a reality on the ground there must be accountability for officers who break the rules.

“The only way this gets fixed … is that the people who [do wrong] are punished,” Ken Williams, a former Brockton, Mass., police officer said at the San Francisco Public Defender’s annual justice summit Wednesday.

The Police Department’s use-of-force policy has not changed in more than 20 years, and the current unfinalized draft is meant to emphasize de-escalation techniques, such as time and distance, as a way to make the sanctity of life a central plank of how the department deals with use-of-force incidents.

As it stands, the policy leaves far too much discretion for each officer, according to Williams, and the killings of Luis Gongora (in April) and Mario Woods (in December 2015) by police show that to be the case. Under the current policy, officers are allowed to use lethal force when they feel their lives or the lives of civilians are threatened. Those definitions must be crystal clear.

But no matter what the new policies are, Williams says accountability is a must — a claim others have repeated.

Still, the Police Officers Association has opposed the proposed policies, which could impact their implementation.

Williams, who was a whistleblower in an incident that ended his law enforcement career in Massachusetts, said accountability must also be about embracing instead of punishing whistleblowers.

The department’s record up to now is mixed on both counts.

Two recent cases involving whistleblowers indicate that such officers are run out of the department, rather than embraced.

As for the level and frequency of punishment, a recent report indicated little punishment is meted out to officers who break the rules.

The District Attorney-launched Blue Ribbon Panel on police bias found in its preliminary report “there is no transparency in the disciplinary process.” What’s more, the report found the disciplinary guidelines are outdated and there is little tracking of the outcome of discipline.

And investigations into police misconduct allegations by the department’s watchdog, the Office of Citizen Complaints, “rarely result in disciplinary consequences, and when they do, the discipline imposed is almost always mild.”

Still, Police Commission President Suzy Loftus has said the commission and department have been busily punishing misbehaving cops in recent years. And under exChief Greg Suhr, the department moved to fire a group of officers who sent racist text messages, as well as other disciplinary actions against bad officers.


Read more criminal justice news on the Crime Ink page in print. Follow us on Twitter: @sfcrimeink
Crimeken williamsSan Francisco Police Department

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

New plan provides a road map to better transit for Bayview residents

SFMTA to review suite of 101 projects designed to improve community safety and access

Mandelman bringing bathhouses back to The City

New ordinance would amend health code restrictions imposed in 1980s

Bernie Sanders draws large crowd at Richmond rally

Democratic presidential candidate U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders drew a large crowd at… Continue reading

Quarantined ship passengers sequestered at Travis Air Force Base

More than a dozen have tested positive for coronavirus

Japanese American family at heart of beloved Golden Gate Park garden

The Japanese Tea Garden, the oldest public Japanese garden in North America,… Continue reading

Most Read