Fine of $50,000 for illegal billboard a sign of stepped-up enforcement

A private homeowner was fined $50,000 after he refused to remove an illegal billboard from his freeway-fronting house, as a result of a legal ruling that’s expected to boost The City’s quest to cleanse San Francisco of hundreds of advertising signs that are up without permits.

Late last year, the San Francisco Planning Department began enforcement of a 2002 voter-approved ballot initiative that banned new outdoor advertising signs. Additionally, signs installed before 2002 without a permit are considered illegal as a result of a law passed in 2006 by the Board of Supervisors.

Of the 1,464 outdoor advertising signs identified across The City, the department has ordered 96 removed, found 159 to be “generally legal” and more than 1,000 are still under review, according to city Senior Planner Dan Sider.

Sider said 59 signs have already been torn down. “It’s the tip of the iceberg, but it’s a tangible, physical change,” Sider said.

Hector Navarro appealed against a December order to remove a 48-foot-wide advertising sign from the top floor of his house on Folsom Street near U.S. Highway 101, court documents show. Advertisements have been painted or posted on the weatherboard home since the mid-1950s, the documents show.

On Wednesday, administrative law Judge Peter Kearns upheld The City’s order to remove the sign and he imposed a minimum fine of $50,000 against Navarro for refusing to do so. Navarro must also pay $3,400 in appeal fees.

Navarro’s attorney, Gerald Murphy, told The Examiner he expects to appeal the ruling. “We believe it’s unconstitutional,” he said.

“People were expecting Clear Channel and CBS to take the hammer — not a regular guy,” Murphy said.

San Francisco Beautiful Executive Director Dee Dee Workman said the ruling would help send a “really strong” message to advertisers and property owners.

“I think they can see that The City is not messing around anymore,” Workman said.

jupton@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The City is seeking to enhance health care for San Francisco International Airport workers, which include more than 100 who have tested positive for COVID-19. <ins>(Courtesy photo)</ins>
Airlines, business groups fight new health insurance requirements for SFO workers

Heathy Airport Ordinance would require companies to offer family coverage or increase contributions

The Hall of Justice building at 850 Bryant St. is notorious for sewage leaks and is known to be seismically unsafe. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFPD speeding up Hall of Justice exit after another ‘large leak’

San Francisco police can’t get out of the decrepit Hall of Justice… Continue reading

The main entrance to Laguna Honda Hospital and Rehabilitation Center on Thursday, Sept. 5, 2019. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Voting rights of seniors, disabled must be protected

Coronavirus pandemic adds new challenges for accessing the polls

The Telegraph Quartet is pictured during its SF Music Day 2020 recording session at the striking, beautifully lit and almost empty Herbst Theatre. (Courtesy Marcus Phillips)
SF Music Day goes virtual with Herbst broadcast

Performers pre-record sets in empty, iconic theater

Dr. Vincent Matthews, superintendent of the San Francisco Unified School District, said Tuesday that student would not be back in school before the end of this calendar year. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Superintendent: City schools will not reopen before the end of the year

San Francisco public schools won’t reopen to students for the rest of… Continue reading

Most Read