Fight over mayor security-detail costs resumes Monday

On Monday, the Board of Supervisors Public Safety Committee meets to debate legislation introduced by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi that would require the mayor to reimburse the city for the costs of security detail used when engaged in campaign activity.

The legislation was watered down after Police Chief George Gascon and others raised concerns about it, including that it could jeopardize the safety of the mayor. The proposed legislation made it to the full Board of Supervisors for a vote, but was referred back to committee for further debate after it was amended.

The original piece of legislation would have required to mayor to reimburse the city for the cost of security detail used when engaged in campaigning activity outside of San Francisco. That was changed to require reimbursement only when outside of California.

Changes also narrowed the definition of “campaign-related activity” to mean “any activity or meeting with the purpose of advocating or raising funds for the city elective officer’s election to any state or federal elective office.”

Just Posted

Delivery companies prompt a human vs robot showdown

Two years after ban and regulations passed, companies awaiting approval of testing permits

Report: Uber and Lyft’s rise tanked wheelchair access to taxis

A new city report details the devastating drop in on-demand rides for the disability community after the rise of Uber and Lyft.

Discovery of human remains at home of missing man upsets Outer Mission neighbors

Police are investigating the disappearance of 73-year-old Benedict Ching

Google says it is ‘committed’ to helping the Punch Line stay in its home

Comedy club threatened with loss of lease, displacement after more than 40 years

Woman caught in Muni door, dragged to tracks files claim against SF

Sunset District resident suffered collapsed lung, broken ribs, spinal and pelvic fractures

Most Read