Federal judge upholds most of Prop. F campaign disclosure rules

Federal judge upholds most of Prop. F campaign disclosure rules

A federal judge on Thursday upheld most of San Francisco’s Proposition F, a voter-approved law that set stronger rules for disclosure of donors to political campaign advertisements.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco turned down most of a campaign committee’s bid for a preliminary injunction blocking the measure, which the committee claimed violated its right of free speech.

Breyer wrote that when applied to larger ads, the new rules serve “the important governmental interest in informing voters about who is paying for political advertising” and do not unduly burden free speech. But the judge issued a narrow preliminary injunction blocking the rules when applied to small printed ads less than 5 inches by 5 inches, and in radio and televisions ads of less than 30 seconds.

In the case of the smaller ads, the judge said, the required disclosures would have consumed most of the time or space in the messages. The city had agreed to the narrow injunction.

Proposition F, known as the Sunlight on Dark Money Initiative, was approved by San Francisco voters in November. It requires newspaper and broadcast campaign ads to list donor names and amounts for the top three contributions of $5,000 or more.

When one of the top donors is itself a committee, the ads must also identify the top two contributors to that committee.

The lawsuit challenging the measure was filed by a committee that supports Proposition B, an earthquake safety bond measure on the March 3 ballot. A lawyer for the committee was not immediately available for comment.

Former San Francisco Ethics Commission Chair Peter Keane, who was a co-author of the initiative, said in a statement, “We are delighted that the judge has upheld Proposition F and resoundingly rejected this cynical lawsuit aimed at keeping voters in the dark so that secretive SuperPACs can hide the real agenda behind their campaign ads.”

Bay Area NewsPoliticssan francisco news

Just Posted

Ahmad Ibrahim Moss, a Lyft driver whose pandemic-related unemployment benefits have stopped, is driving again and relying on public assistance to help make ends meet. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
How much does gig work cost taxpayers?

Some drivers and labor experts say Prop. 22 pushed an undue burden on to everyday taxpayers.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, who visited the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 6 headquarters on Recall Election Day, handily won after a summer of political high jinks.	<ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Lessons from a landslide: Key takeaways from California’s recall circus

‘After a summer of half-baked polls and overheated press coverage, the race wasn’t even close’

Suicide is the second leading cause of death for adolescents in the U.S. (Shutterstock)
Why California teens need mental illness education

SB 224 calls for in-school mental health instruction as depression and suicide rates rise

The Kimpton Buchanan Hotel in Japantown could become permanent supportive housing if The City can overcome neighborhood pushback. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Nimbytown: Will SF neighborhoods allow vacant hotels to house the homeless?

‘We have a crisis on our hands and we need as many options as possible’

Most Read