Jim Steinle, center, and Elizabeth Sullivan, parents of Kate Steinle, enter the courtroom during the fifth day of trial in the case against Jose Ines Garcia Zarate for the 2015 killing of 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco, Calif. Monday, October 30, 2017. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

Jim Steinle, center, and Elizabeth Sullivan, parents of Kate Steinle, enter the courtroom during the fifth day of trial in the case against Jose Ines Garcia Zarate for the 2015 killing of 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle at the Hall of Justice in San Francisco, Calif. Monday, October 30, 2017. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

Family continues fight to sue SF over Kate Steinle’s fatal shooting

A panel of federal appeals court judges heard arguments Thursday in a lawsuit from the parents of Kate Steinle, who are trying to have their case reinstated against San Francisco for the shooting of their daughter by an undocumented immigrant.

Steinle’s parents filed the lawsuit in May 2016 against former Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi for creating a sanctuary policy that prevented deputies from notifying immigration authorities when Jose Ines Garcia Zarate was released from jail.

Months after his release, Garcia Zarate fired a bullet from a stolen gun that ricocheted and struck Steinle in the back on Pier 14 on July 1, 2015. The killing set off a political firestorm as President Donald Trump pointed to the case to call for a crackdown on illegal immigration during his presidential campaign.

James Steinle and Elizabeth Sullivan also named the federal government in the lawsuit because a U.S. Bureau of Land Management ranger left his loaded firearm in the backseat of a parked car along the Embarcadero. The gun was stolen in an auto burglary and later used to shoot Steinle.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero dismissed the allegations against Mirkarimi in January 2017, but he allowed the case to continue against the U.S.

Spero found that the policy Mirkarimi created did not violate federal law as alleged in the lawsuit and that Mirkarimi was immune from liability in the death as a government official making a discretionary decision under California law.

But Alison Cordova, an attorney for the Steinle family, argued against the ruling on Thursday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth District.

“He’s not vested with discretion to create a policy that violates the law,” Cordova said, arguing that Mirkarimi created a “no contact” policy with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in violation of federal law.

One issue is whether Mirkarimi could have reasonably foreseen releasing Garcia Zarate would lead to the Steinle shooting or to a public safety threat in general.

Deputy City Attorney Margaret Baumgartner said there was a “lack of causation” between the creation of the policy and the shooting.

Baumgartner said there were a “number of discretionary events that would have had to have occured to prevent the particular action on the pier that resulted in the unfortunate death.”

But U.S. Circuit Judge Mark Bennett repeated an argument from Cordova that Steinle would not have died had ICE been notified.

“Don’t they quote ICE saying that they would have taken this man in custody and this tragedy would not have occured?” Bennett said.

On the other hand, U.S. Circuit Judge Susan Graber seemed to side with Spero.

“I’m concerned that there is no real causation between the acts that you’re alleging against The City,” Graber told Cordova. “They can’t foresee that a ranger is going to leave a firearm lying around.”

The appeals court is expected to decide on the case within three months to a year.

The case against the U.S. is ongoing.

Garcia Zarate was acquitted of murder and lesser charges in San Francisco Superior Court, but found guilty of illegal gun possession. He is currently facing separate illegal gun possession charges in federal court.

mbarba@sfexaminer.com Crime

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Giants second baseman Donovan Solano scores on a double in the seventh inning against the Dodgers at Oracle Park on July 29. (Chris Victorio/Special to The Examiner)
Will the Giants make the playoffs? Kris Bryant may be the answer

By Chris Haft Special to The Examiner You’d be hard-pressed to find… Continue reading

Tiffany Carter, a co-founder of SF Black Wallstreet, at her restaurant, Boug Cali West Coast Creole Shack in the La Cocina Marketplace on Friday, July 30, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
SF Black Wallstreet: Helping residents build wealth, reclaim spaces they’ve had to leave

Tiffany Carter moved back to her hometown of San Francisco five years… Continue reading

A prescribed fire at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks was conducted in June 2016 to reduce hazardous fuel loading, increase watershed health, and restore the natural fire cycle in the Redwood Canyon area ecosystem. (Photo courtesy Rebecca Paterson/National Park Service)
Experts, UC scientists discuss wildfires in the state’s riskiest regions

Wildfires are nothing new in California’s history, but the magnitude and frequencies… Continue reading

Fourth-grade students at Lucerne Valley Elementary School don masks and Western wear for a “Walk Through California” history day during in-person instruction. (Courtesy of Krystal Nelson)
Confusion over mask mandate for California schools sparks tension between districts and parents

By Diana Lambert EdSource Shifting rules around mask mandates at schools are… Continue reading

Steven Buss, left, and Sachin Agarwal, co-founders of Grow SF, a new group that aims to offer folks a moderate take on SF politics, on Friday, July 30, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Grow SF: New tech group aims to promote moderate ideals to political newcomers

Sachin Agarwal has lived in San Francisco for 15 years. But the… Continue reading

Most Read