Ex-Sen. Mitchell withdraws as mediator in San Bruno, PG&E settlement talks

AP file photoFormer Sen. George Mitchell in a 2010 file photo.

AP file photoFormer Sen. George Mitchell in a 2010 file photo.

Former U.S. Sen. George Mitchell has stepped down from overseeing private settlement talks over a deadly Northern California pipeline explosion after state regulators set up a mediation process criticized by several parties as an unfair, backroom deal.

The California Public Utilities Commission appointed the former Senate Majority Leader earlier this month to mediate a settlement aimed at determining how much Pacific Gas & Electric Co. should be fined for the blast.

But the cities of San Bruno and San Francisco as well as the commission's own consumer advocacy branch said Mitchell should not preside over talks because the commission had given PG&E advance notice of his hiring.

The organizations did not question the talents of Mitchell — who brokered the 1998 Northern Ireland treaty — but were concerned that he and his law firm, DLA Piper, previously had represented public utilities.

“What seemed to prompt the concern was simply the way we decided to appoint him, without prior consultation with the parties,” said Commissioner Mike Florio, who chairs one of the proceedings intended to determine the level of fines for PG&E.

Over the past two years, the company has faced grueling public hearings over potential malfeasance leading up to the 2010 blast, which killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes in San Bruno, a bedroom community just south of San Francisco.

Commission staff said in an internal letter that settlement talks could restart Monday, now without a mediator.

“We're looking forward getting back to the negotiating table,” said San Bruno City Manager Connie Jackson. “It was forced mediation and a forced mediator that we objected to.”

Mitchell's law firm did not immediately return emails and voicemails seeking comment Friday.

“We continue to support negotiations and look forward to being part of the process,” said Todd Burke, a PG&E spokesman.

PG&E and the CPUC have refused to disclose any specifics about how much Mitchell and his firm were to be paid, or any other details about the contract. Tom Long, an attorney with the San Francisco-based nonprofit The Utility Reform Network, said the parties never actually met with Mitchell.

Bay Area NewsLocalPeninsula

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott leaves the scene of an officer-involved shooting at Brannan Street and Jack London Alley in the South Park area on Friday, May 7, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Chief Scott issues rare apology to man shot by SF police

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott issued a rare apology Thursday to… Continue reading

Passengers board a BART train bound for the San Francisco Airport at Powell Street station. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
BART bumps up service restoration to August 30, offers fare discounts

Rail agency breaks pandemic ridership records, prepares to welcome more passengers

Ashley and Michelle Monterrosa hold a photo of their brother Sean Monterrosa, who was killed by a Vallejo police officer early Tuesday morning, as they are comforted at a memorial rally at the 24th Street Mission BART plaza on Friday, June 5, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
State Department of Justice to investigate Sean Monterrosa shooting by Vallejo police

Attorney General Rob Bonta steps in after Solano County DA declines case

Gov. Gavin Newsom, show here speaking at the City College of San Francisco mass vaccination site in April, faces a recall election due to anger on the right over his handling of the pandemic, among other issues. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Why Gavin Newsom’s popularity could work against him in the recall election

Top pollster: ‘We’re not seeing the Democrats engaged in this election. And that may be a problem…’

Passengers ride the 14-Mission Muni bus on Friday, March 12, 2021. (Jordi Molina/Special to S.F. Examiner)
Transit officials fear Free Muni pilot could hurt already-strained service levels

Supporters say fare cuts could increase ridership, help low-income residents

Most Read