Environmental group sues state over San Francisco Bay sand mining report

S.F. Examiner File PhotoBig stir: Bay sand dredging

S.F. Examiner File PhotoBig stir: Bay sand dredging

An environmental group is suing the state over an environmental report that could pave the way for an increase in sand mining in San Francisco Bay, saying the study fails to take into consideration the ?erosion at Ocean Beach.

Last month, the California State Lands Commission approved the environmental review for two sand mining permits in San Francisco and Suisan bays. Two companies — Hanson Aggregates Marine and Jerico Products — are seeking a 17.4 percent increase in the amount of sand they can remove over a 10-year lease on the state-owned land.

San Francisco Baykeeper, an environmental advocacy group, filed a lawsuit Nov. 16, arguing that the environmental review did not adequately evaluate the impact of Bay sand depletion on coastal erosion.

People have removed sand from the Bay for more than 100 years to clear harbors and channels and, more recently, obtain construction material. It was assumed that the sand replenished itself.

But scientific studies now show that only 15 percent of the sand mined for construction material is replenished. That decrease partially stems from the reduction in sediment from Gold Rush-era hydraulic mining in the Sierra Nevada mountains. Dams and flood control measures also have reduced the water and sediment flow through the delta and into the Bay.

Patrick Barnard, a coastal geologist for the U.S. Geological Society, said the decrease in sediment replenishment is one of the causes of erosion at the southern portion of Ocean Beach, which is threatening valuable city infrastructure, including Great Highway and a water treatment plant worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

Ian Wren, a staff scientist at Baykeeper, said the lawsuit is asking for the state to ensure that the environmental review reflects the impacts to Ocean Beach.

“We are not saying that sand mining should be done away with altogether,” Wren said.

Lands Commission Executive Director Curtis Fossum said the environmental review was done over the course of many years and was thoroughly vetted by staff. He said the review was limited to the specific part of the Bay where the sand mining would occur.

“We stand by the commission’s actions,” he said of the lawsuit, which he had not seen Wednesday.

In response to a question about what new research suggests about the impact of Bay sediment depletion, Fossum said, “People can come up with new information at any minute.” He said his agency has to balance conflicting expert opinion and recommend what is best for the state.

Peter Baye, an independent coastal ecology consultant, has recommended that mining be decreased to the rate of sand replenishment. That would result in a drastic reduction in the amount of sand removed, not the increase the two companies are seeking.

Alternatives to mining bay sand include mining it from local land-based sources or shipping or trucking such material in from glacial deposits, mostly in British Columbia. Both, however, could increase greenhouse gas emissions.

Spokesmen from both sand mining companies recently told the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission that sand mining from the Bay is less ?expensive and more ecological.

The mining permits will require approval from several federal, state and local agencies.

mbillings@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsGovernment & PoliticsLocalOcean BeachPoliticsSan Francisco Bay

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Baseball Hall of Famer Willie Mays attends an event to honor the San Francisco Giants' 2014 World Series victory on Thursday, June 4, 2015, in Washington, D.C. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)
Willie Mays turns 90: San Francisco celebrates the greatest Giant

By Al Saracevic Examiner staff writer I couldn’t believe it. Willie Mays… Continue reading

Ja’Mari Oliver, center, 11, a fifth grader at Harvey Milk Civil Rights Academy, is surrounded by his classmates at a protest outside the Safeway at Church and Market streets on Wednesday, May 5, 2021 in support of him following an April 26 incident where he was falsely accused by an employee of stealing. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
School community rallies behind Black classmate stopped at Safeway

‘When you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us’

A warning notice sits under the windshield wiper of a recreational vehicle belonging to a homeless man named David as it sits parked on De Wolf Street near Alemany Boulevard on Friday, Aug. 31, 2018. A proposed SF Municipal Transportation Agency law would make it illegal for overnight parking on the side street for vehicles taller than seven feet or longer than 22 feet. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFMTA to resume ‘poverty tows’ amid calls to make temporary ban permanent

Fines and fees hurt low-income, homeless residents, but officials say they are a necessary tool

Income from Shared Spaces will provide financial resources to the San Francisco Municipal Transporation Agency, according to its director, Jeffrey Tumlin. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFMTA director says Shared Spaces serves transit agency’s financial interest

$10.6 million price tag for program raises concerns among transit agency’s board members

A broad coalition of tenants and housing rights organizers rally at Stanley Mosk Courthouse to protest eviction orders issued against renters Stanley Mosk Courthouse on Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2020, in Los Angeles, CA. (Irfan Khan/Los Angeles Times/TNS)
Federal judge strikes down CDC’s national moratorium on evictions

David Yaffe-Bellany, Noah Buhayar Los Angeles Times A federal judge in Washington… Continue reading

Most Read