Elected officials, community groups oppose housing development on Redwood City salt pond site

A group of elected officials and community organizations from across the Bay Area released a joint statement Tuesday to oppose any housing development project on salt ponds in Redwood City.

The group alleges that landowner Cargill Salt and its partner DMB Pacific Ventures, a luxury home development firm, “colluded” with President Donald Trump’s government to weaken federal Clean Water Act protections for San Francisco Bay.

In March, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized its jurisdictional determination for the Redwood City Salt Plant site and concluded that the land does not include “waters of the United States” and is therefore exempt from the Clear Water Act.

DMB Pacific Ventures had proposed a previous 12,000-home project on the salt ponds in 2012, but withdrew their proposal after facing public outcry.

“Redwood City residents don’t want our city’s future growth to occur on a restorable wetland out in the Bay, where it will make traffic gridlock worse and be vulnerable to earthquakes,” said Dan Ponti, steering committee member at Redwood City Neighbors United.

According to the EPA, restoring wetlands is important to maintain wildlife, meet watershed goals and contribute to economic well-being. The agency’s website also highlights the role of wetlands in reducing the frequency of floods and acting as natural buffers to downscale the intensity of storms and wind wave action.

“We need to address our existing regional vulnerability to sea level rise, annual flooding of homes and businesses, crippling congestion, access to integrated public transit options on both water and land, housing and habitat restoration,” said David Smith on behalf of Reimagine Saltworks, the two companies’ joint venture.

Smith said the companies intend to engage in broad community conversation about potential uses of the property, and nothing has been proposed for the future of the active industrial salt harvesting facility.

The 42 elected officials that ask Redwood City to reject the project include Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Atherton, Rep. Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Fremont, alongside several state Assembly members and mayors of San Francisco, San Jose, Menlo Park, Atherton, Palo Alto, East Palo Alto and Woodside.

By Ugur Dursun, Bay City News

Just Posted

Climate strike organizers say SFUSD blocked student participation

The organizers behind Friday’s Climate Strike in San Francisco are accusing the… Continue reading

City puts closure of long-term mental health beds on hold

In response to public outrage over a proposal to suspend 41 permanent… Continue reading

Here we go again – new dog rules in Golden Gate National Recreation Area

The GGNRA released a 2019 Superintendent’s Compendium that makes significant changes that appear to implement parts of the ill-fated Dog Management Plan.

Thousands take to San Francisco streets in Climate Strike

The protesters are calling for urgent action on climate change, including putting pressure on local elected leaders to support more drastic steps.

Good Day Sept. 22-24, 2019

Mark Morris Dance Group, Presidio Theatre Open House, PUSHFest, Community Music Center Sunday, Making Faces-Portraits by John Kascht, WWE Monday Night Raw, Margaret Atwood, George Takei, Durand Jones, Kurt Ribak, Incubus

Most Read