The two residential towers in the Dogpatch will now have eight below-market-rate-units, instead of the 17 originally proposed. (Courtesy SF Planning)

Dogpatch developer cuts plans to build on-site affordable housing in half

The developer of two residential towers in the Dogpatch will build less than half of the affordable housing units originally planned for the site because of rising construction costs in San Francisco, according to an attorney for the company.

The Planning Commission first approved plans for the seven-story towers at Third and 19th streets in January 2016. The proposal included 92 market-rate units, 17 below-market rate units and ground-floor retail.

Developer Align Real Estate proposed scrapping the on-site affordable housing units entirely earlier this month and instead paying nearly $11.5 million to the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development in lieu of on-site units.

“The bottom line is the construction costs are starting to drive projects crazy,” Andrew Junius, an attorney representing the developer, told the Planning Commission last Thursday. “These kinds of solutions are necessary.”

But the developer has since agreed to reduce the number of below-market-rate units to eight and pay the remaining fees — likely several million dollars — to MOHCD under a compromise with Supervisor Malia Cohen.

“This is a balanced compromise that acknowledges the rising construction fees in our city but also ensures we continue to grow the diversity that shape and define our neighborhoods in The City, especially in the southeastern neighborhoods,” Cohen’s aide Yoyo Chan told the commission.

The Planning Commission allowed the project to move forward under the compromise.

Under current inclusionary housing requirements, the developer could have paid nearly $11.5 million in lieu of building on-site or built 19 below-market-rate units on site.

Mc Allen, a member of the Dogpatch Neighborhood Association, said at the meeting that the group pulled its support for the project after learning of the change in affordable housing.

“We really want to see it happen, but we feel that the thing that was greatest about this project is that it was going to bring an opportunity for … families who otherwise would not have an opportunity to come to our neighborhood,” Allen said. “When we learned of this modification, we were immediately opposed to it.”

Though developers are allowed to choose their preferred option when it comes to inclusionary housing requirements, there is debate over which is better.

Planning Commissioner Kathrin Moore said the commission favors on-site affordable housing “in order to foster and continue the diversity of neighborhoods.”

Planning Commissioner Christine Johnson said that MOHCD, which uses in-lieu fees to build affordable housing around San Francisco, is “funding challenged due to the recent push for on-site.”

“On the other side of that, there are good reasons that where neighborhoods are accepting a lot of new development, the income diversity in those buildings is going to come from having on-site,” Johnson said.

Align Real Estate is also increasing the number of on-site units from 109 to 114 under the latest plans.

Editor’s Note: This story has been updated from its original version.Planning

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

Japanese American family at heart of beloved Golden Gate Park garden

The Japanese Tea Garden, the oldest public Japanese garden in North America,… Continue reading

Coronavirus cruise ship passengers head to California military base for quarantine

LOS ANGELES — American passengers evacuated from a cruise ship in which… Continue reading

Kicking off the budgeting process with the School Planning Summit

Last week I shared some information about SFUSD’s budget. I mentioned how… Continue reading

SF Lives: A ‘poverty scholar’ gives visibility to homeless people

Houseless, landless and unhoused are the preferred terms of Gray-Garcia and the people she’s aligned with in the POOR Media Network.

The racial contours of our housing crisis

Black residents of Midtown apartments deserve ownership

Most Read