Details in works for PG&E trials

Attorneys representing PG&E and more than 100 San Bruno residents who have sued the utility over the Sept. 9 gas line explosion are expected to meet for the first time to begin planning court proceedings Thursday.

At least 35 separate lawsuits from eight firms have been filed against PG&E in connection with the disaster, which killed eight people and destroyed or seriously damaged 55 homes.

Almost all the plaintiffs accuse PG&E of negligence for failing to properly maintain or inspect the San Bruno pipeline that exploded. Also, many seek damages for physical or emotional injuries.

All but a couple suits were filed in San Mateo County Superior Court, which assigned Judge Steven Dylina to handle those cases. PG&E and the plaintiffs’ lawyers are expected to pick a date today for a future status conference with Dylina to hash out how the cases will be handled, including a timeline for trial dates.

But at least two cases were filed in San Francisco, prompting PG&E to ask the state’s judicial council to assign all the cases related to the blast to a single San Mateo County judge. The council has yet to rule on that request.

Michael Danko, a San Mateo attorney who has filed seven lawsuits in San Mateo County on behalf of victims, said it is somewhat unusual to ask a judge to consolidate cases from multiple counties.

“It’s kind of a big deal because generally plaintiffs are entitled to pick the venue,” Danko said. “Somebody’s going to be disappointed.”

PG&E spokeswoman Katie Romans said the request was simply an effort to streamline the process.

“Certainly we respect the plaintiffs’ rights to file the lawsuits,” Romans said. “We’ll work with each of those plaintiffs to try to resolve their concerns.”

sbishop@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsPG&ESan BrunoSan Bruno explosion

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Anti-eviction demonstrators rally outside San Francisco Superior Court. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Report: Unpaid rent due to COVID-19 could be up to $32.7M per month

A new city report that attempts to quantify how much rent has… Continue reading

Music venues around The City have largely been unable to reopen due to ongoing pandemic health orders. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF to cut $2.5M in fees to help 300 nightlife venues

San Francisco will cut $2.5 million in fees for hundreds of entertainment… Continue reading

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett departs the U.S. Capitol on October 21, 2020 in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump nominated Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg after Ginsburg’s death. (Photo by Stefani Reynolds/Getty Images)
GOP senators confirm Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court in partisan vote

By Jennifer Haberkorn Los Angeles Times The Senate on Monday confirmed Judge… Continue reading

Curator Tim Burgard looks over a section of the galleries comprising “The de Young Open,” a huge, varied collection of work by Bay Area artists. (Photo courtesy Gary Sexton/Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco)
Bay Area artists jam-pack vivid ‘de Young Open’

Huge exhibition — with works for sale — showcases diversity, supports community

SF Board of Education vice president Gabriela Lopez and commissioner Alison Collins listen at a news conference condemning recent racist and social media attacks targeted at them and the two student representatives on Monday, Oct. 26, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Online attacks on school board members denounced by city officials

City officials on Monday condemned the targeting of school board members, both… Continue reading

Most Read