file

Complaint filed against SF immigration judge accused of ‘terrorizing’ immigrants

A coalition of 17 legal services and immigration groups on Thursday announced the filing of a complaint against U.S. Immigration Judge Nicholas Ford in San Francisco.

The complained filed with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, calls for an investigation of Ford’s conduct and appropriate action to ensure that those who appear in his court are “treated with due process, dignity, and respect.”

In unusually aggressive language, the coalition accused Ford of “terrorizing the San Francisco immigrant community,” alleging that he dispensed “racist, ableist and hostile treatment of immigrants, attorneys and witnesses.”

Omar de la Cruz, a staff attorney at Centro Legal de la Raza in Oakland, is a full-time immigration lawyer and frequently appears before the immigration judges in San Francisco. De la Cruz says that Ford is an outlier in that court for the manner in which he treats witnesses.

The other immigration judges, “for the most part, they conduct themselves in a way that’s professional or they conduct themselves in a way that expresses at least some sort of sympathy to the respondents,” he said. “They are at least cognizant of the fact that people in their courtrooms have experienced a lot of trauma.”

With Judge Ford, “it was it was not like that at all. He was very hostile from the beginning. He certainly sounded like he prejudged the case. He was both hostile to me and to the client,” de la Cruz said. “He just wanted to get through it and had no real awareness or interest in the fact that this is somebody’s life in his hands.”

Despite a controversial record as a criminal trial judge in Chicago, in May 2019, Ford was appointed by U.S. Attorney General William Barr to serve as an immigration judge in San Francisco. Ford had no prior immigration experience, according to a statement by the coalition.

Before his post in San Francisco, Ford served 16 years as an Illinois circuit court judge assigned to the criminal division of the Circuit Court of Cook County in Chicago. During his tenure he attracted attention for a number of cases where his rulings were reversed on appeal.

When standing for a retention election in Illinois in 2016, Ford was found not qualified by the Chicago Council of Lawyers, though he was recommended by other bar groups. He retired from the bench in April of 2019.

The coalition alleges that Judge Ford’s appointment is “part of the Trump Administration’s deliberate policy to discourage and curtail immigration from every angle, particularly against black and brown immigrants.” Rebekah Entralgo, a spokesperson for Freedom for Immigrants, a national organization based in the Bay Area that promotes abolition of immigrant detention, said “the immigration court is really politicized. It’s not an independent court.”

Immigration courts are located under the U.S. Department of Justice. In a July 2019 letter to Congress urging changes in the immigration court structure, Robert Carlson, the President of the American Bar Association, pointed out that the “Attorney General is charged with being both lead prosecutor and lead judge in immigration cases.” That is an “inherent conflict of interest,” Carlson said, and has contributed to “a severe lack of public confidence in the system’s capacity to deliver just and fair decisions in a timely manner.”

Entralgo was particularly concerned that Ford’s history made him a poor choice to be a judge in a court that regularly hears people describe the torture they have experienced in their home countries.

“Going before an immigration judge is a very terrifying experience,” she said. “You basically having to try and recount all the trauma you experience in your country of origin and how to do that before someone who may be deemed hostile to you in the courtroom … and that can obviously have an impact on your case.”

Attempts on Friday to obtain a response to the coalition’s allegations from Judge Ford or the EIOC were not immediately successful.

Bay Area Newsimmigrationsan francisco news

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Charles Joseph, who is represented by the San Francisco Public Defender’s office, is facing deportation to Fiji. <ins>(Courtesy photo)</ins>
Giving immigrants a second chance after incarceration

Legislation would allow some faced with deportation a chance to challenge their old convictions

The San Francisco Police Department released body camera footage of the alleged assault on Dacari Spiers. (Via SFPD Body Cam)
SF police officer to stand trial for assault over baton beating

A San Francisco police officer who prosecutors say unnecessarily beat a man… Continue reading

Mayor London Breed announced The City’s return to the red tier for COVID-19 precautions at Pier 39 on Tuesday<ins>, March 2, 2021</ins>. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
San Francisco enters red COVID tier, indoor dining to resume

Museums and gyms can reopen with capacity limits

Cole Odin Berggren, community programs director and drum and DJ instructor at Blue Bear School of Music in The City, holds a JackTrip device, which he says has greatly improved students’ experience of making music online. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
COVID-era musicians beginning to make connections

Software eliminates pesky delay plaguing most systems

Under the new plan, Twin Peaks Boulevard would be reserved exclusively for pedestrians and cyclists until Christmas Tree Point.	(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFMTA board approves new plan for Twin Peaks Boulevard

Cuts vehicle-free space by half. Neighbors say crime, vandalism will still abound

Most Read