Police Commissioner Petra DeJesus speaks during a meeting at City Hall about the use of force within the San Francisco Police Department. (Ekevara Kitpowsong/2016 Special to S.F. Examiner)

Committee votes 2-1 in favor of reappointing SF police commissioner

Longtime Police Commissioner Petra DeJesus won the divided backing of the Board of Supervisors Rules Committee for reappointment Thursday following intense questioning on topics including police overtime, use of force policies, community policing and stun guns.

DeJesus, who was first appointed to the commission by the Board of Supervisors in 2005, completed her most recent term on April 30. She is known as a progressive voice on the commission and a skeptic on the use of stun guns, which police officials have advocated for.

Her bid for reappointment faced competition after union leader Olga Miranda applied for the position with the reported backing of Supervisor Ahsha Safai, who chairs the Rules Committee.

Miranda proved controversial, however, and a hearing on the appointment was delayed until after she dropped her application.

SEE RELATED: Moderate-backed Police Commission candidate withdraws from running

Safai and Board President London Breed both questioned DeJesus closely Thursday about her performance on the commission, with Breed calling out what she described as a lack of oversight on overtime spending, among other issues.

“The commission is responsible for oversight of the department, yet the overtime continues to be problematic,” Breed said. “I want to understand what your role is and how did the commission drop the ball?”

SEE RELATED: SF’s new police chief defends soaring overtime spending

DeJesus suggested that the commission could reinstate a practice of asking for a weekly report on overtime spending from the chief.

Both Breed and Safai asked DeJesus to elaborate on her views on the use of stun guns, which have previously been voted down by the commission despite a strong push by police to see them implemented as a less-lethal option.

DeJesus said the science did not support the use of stun guns and that they carried risks and liabilities that were glossed over by manufacturers and advocates for their use. Ultimately, she said, police have many other alternatives and could avoid many officer-involved shootings with better training and tactics.

“Let’s be real critical about our training and our officers,” DeJesus said. “We have training failures, so they say reward us with a weapon. Let’s talk about training failures.”

Ultimately, the committee voted 2-1 to recommend DeJesus for reappointment, with Safai opposed. He cited his desire to see a new person on the commission.

“I fundamentally believe in term limits,” Safai said. “Term limits are designed to ensure that there would be a diversity of opinions.”CrimePolitics

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

City Attorney targets permit expediter, developers in new round of subpoenas

San Francisco’s corruption scandal is the dumpster fire that keeps on giving… Continue reading

Court temporarily blocks Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

A federal appeals court decided 2-1 on Friday to block a Trump… Continue reading

SF to introduce legislation authorizing safe injection sites

Mayor Breed and Supervisor Haney join forces to create regulations, permit process for nonprofits

Newsom says state to expand testing capacity for coronavirus

Health officials mobilizing resources after case of unknown origin reported in Solano County

Study: Banning cars on Market had minimal effect on side streets

A traffic nightmare. Congestions madness. Carmageddon. Those were the fears voiced by… Continue reading

Most Read