An SFPD car sits on the corner of Golden Gate and Larkin in San Francisco, Calif. Friday, April 1, 2016. (Jessica Christian/S.F. Examiner)

Civil liberties groups fear SFPD could again help FBI spy on locals under Trump

Civil libertarians in San Francisco, who think President-elect Donald Trump will fulfill his promises to focus increased surveillance on minority groups, fear local law enforcement may help their federal counterparts spy on law-obeying residents even though a local ordinance prohibits such cooperation.

That’s because a city ordinance passed four years ago, which bars San Francisco police from taking part in certain investigations with the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, has not always been followed by police.

“We have been concerned about the collaboration between local and federal law enforcement,” said Lara Kiswani, executive director of the Arab Resource and Organizing Center, who noted that little progress has been made since The City passed a law curbing that cooperation.

In 2012, San Francisco passed an ordinance narrowing what kind of counterterrorism activities its police could take part in and requiring the department to report such activities to the Police Commission once a year. The Safe San Francisco Civil Rights Ordinance was adopted after documents showed the FBI and police were illegally spying on Muslims in the Bay Area.

“Federal agencies were treating Muslim Americans in a way that we viewed as unconstitutional,” said Asian Law Caucus staffer Christina Sinha, who said she is hopeful about fully implementing the local ordinance now and has had several recent meetings with police brass on the issue. Another is set for Tuesday, she said.

Despite its passage, the department has not always stayed true to The City’s mandate, and that fact worries local civil liberty groups, specifically because Trump has said he wants to increase surveillance of religious minorities and specific populations because of their nation of origin.

Additionally, the ordinance’s full implementation relies on the department reporting on whether it has violated the ordinance, Police Commissioner Victor Hwang said.

“We rely on the department for accurate information,” said Hwang, who questioned whether that was being delivered. In its last annual report on the subject, the department reported that no violation had occurred.

The San Francisco Police Department did not respond to a request for comment.

On June 4, 2014, Sarmand Gilani, then a 29-year-old Google employee of Pakistani descent, was interviewed about a vague variety of activities by a federal official and a San Francisco police officer who was the department’s liaison to the FBI terrorism task force at the time. Gilani claims he did nothing wrong and was never told why he was under suspicion.

The San Francisco police oversight body, then known as the Office of Citizen Complaints, found that while the officer broke city law and department orders, the fault was not his alone since it was due to a lack of training.

But the incident is an example of the SFPD violating city law by taking part in an interview with a federal agent. Gilani was not suspected of breaking the law, and the interview was not undertaken because the law enforcement officers had probable cause, according to Gilani and the civil liberties groups concerned with his case.

John Crew, a former ACLU lawyer who until recently represented the Asian Law Caucus in the Gilani case, said the department is meeting with the groups who raised issues because of the Gilani case. He said he hopes the tone of national politics puts an increased pressure on the department to fully follow the ordinance.

“The big picture now is that there has always been a need for San Francisco to make sure our stronger civil rights protections are in full effect when our local officers are working with the FBI,” Crew said. “It is even more critical that we get this right and fix this problem because it will soon be Donald Trump’s FBI.”

While Crew said it’s too soon to say if Trump’s calls for increased surveillance and scrutiny of Muslims and other minorities will come to fruition, he noted that it’s better to be safe than sorry.

“I am taking seriously what candidate Donald Trump said during the campaign,” Crew said. “At minimum, we should prepare.”

Untitled-1

Read more criminal justice news on the Crime Ink page in print. Follow us on Twitter: @sfcrimeinkCrime

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

City officials closed San Francisco County Jail No. 4 on the top floor of the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. in September, reducing the number of beds in the jail system by about 400. 
Kevin N. Hume/
S.F. Examiner
SF jail closure prompts doctor to call for release of more inmates

Reduced space increases risk of COVID-19 spreading among those in custody

Cyclists have flocked to Market Street since private vehicles were largely banned from a long stretch of it in January. (Amanda Peterson/Special to the S.F. Examiner)
Plans for sidewalk-level bikeway on Market Street dropped due to costs, increased cyclist volume

Advocates say revisions to Better Market Street fail to meet safety goals of project

Prop. 21 would allow San Francisco city officials to expand rent control to cover thousands more units. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Tenant advocates take another try at expanding rent control with Prop. 21

Measure would allow city to impose new protections on properties 15 years or older

Tenderloin residents are finding benefits to having roads closed in the neighborhood. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Should there be fewer cars in the Tenderloin’s future?

The pandemic has opened San Franciscans’ eyes to new uses of urban streets

Singer-songwriter Cam is finding musicmaking to be healing during 2020’s world health crisis. 
Courtesy 
Dennis Leupold
Cam challenges country music tropes

Bay Area-bred songwriter releases ‘The Otherside’

Most Read