City to decide joint fire department’s fate

The future of the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department could be determined by a difference of as little as $80,000.

After two hours of fiscal wrangling Tuesday at a meeting, the department’s board presented Belmont officials with three options for funding fire services that would see Belmont paying anywhere from $4.92 million to $4.99 million, while San Carlos would pay $5.25 millionto $5.33 million.

The failure of a $2.3 million property assessment this fall that would have eased the $10.3 million budget of the joint fire department has left the two cities, which have shared a department since 1976, at odds with each other over finances. Belmont officials have said they will leave the department if San Carlos does not agree to pay more than the current 50-50 split, and are set to vote Thursday on whether to dissolve the partnership as of Dec. 31.

San Carlos has tentatively agreed to Belmont’s demand to pay more, but both cities are still haggling over just how much.

“If we don’t agree to [one of these formulas] Thursday, I think the dissolution letter will be sent,” Belmont City Councilman and fire board member Phil Matthewson said after Tuesday’s meeting.

Belmont officials have argued that San Carlos should pay more because it has more residents, more land and more calls for fire and paramedic service.

“Belmont won’t agree to pay more than 47 percent, and San Carlos doesn’t want to pay more than 50 percent,” San Carlos City Councilman and fire board member Bob Grassilli said.

Somewhat ironically, Belmont has a balanced city budget and a dedicated property tax that will raise $5.6 million for fire services in the 2006-07 fiscal year, according to Belmont Finance Director Thomas Fil. San Carlos has a budget shortfall and no similar tax apportionment, San Carlos Assistant City Manager Brian Moura said.

If the department stays together, the cities hope to raise additional funds in future years by increasing a number of fire-related inspection fees. That money could be used to fill the gap between the two cities’ contributions, or to start a reserve fund — something the department lacks.

None of the proposed funding formulas discussed Tuesday addresses how the cities will pay for $16 million in retiree medical benefits liabilities, according to Moura.

The Belmont City Council meets Thursday at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall, One Twin Pines Lane.

bwinegarner@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsLocalneighborhoods

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Gov. Gavin Newsom gave an update on COVID-19 cases on Thursday Nov. 3, 2020. (Examiner screenshot)
Newsom announces statewide stay-at-home order tied to availability of hospital beds

Order will take effect in Bay Area when intensive care unit capacity falls below 15 percent

Photo by Abalone Runner/ <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=74406455" target="_blank">CC BY-SA 4.0</a>
Former Newsom spokesman Nathan Ballard facing domestic violence, child abuse charges

Prominent Bay Area political strategist Nathan Ballard is facing domestic violence and… Continue reading

Construction crews work on new red bus rapid transit lanes on Van Ness Avenue on Thursday, Dec. 3, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFMTA board scrutinizes Van Ness BRT spending

Proposed contract modification would allocate $2.6 million for pedestrian monitors

Mayor London Breed said “I need to hold myself to a higher standard” in response to criticism of a recent meal at a Napa Valley restaurant. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Breed calls criticism for French Laundry trip ‘fair’

Mayor said she regrets that actions ‘distracted’ from public health message as COVID-19 cases rise

City Administrator Naomi Kelly said Wednesday that the allegations against her husband were “based on the word of a liar.” (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
City Administrator Naomi Kelly takes leave after feds charge husband

High-ranking official under scrutiny over 2016 China trip

Most Read