City tells court Prop. 8 is 'peculiarly irrational' under state law

The city of San Francisco told a federal appeals court today that “Proposition 8 is peculiarly irrational under California law.”

Lawyers for the city made the argument in a brief asking the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold an August ruling in which U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker struck down California's ban on same-sex marriage.

Supporters of the ban, enacted by state voters as Proposition 8 in 2008, have appealed to the 9th Circuit. The appeals court will hear arguments in San Francisco in early December and in the meantime has stayed Walker's ruling.

In an appeal brief filed in September, Proposition 8 sponsors argued the measure was justified to promote “responsible procreation and child-rearing” by biological parents within heterosexual marriages.

But that reasoning makes no sense because California law treats gay and lesbian parents the same as heterosexual parents and makes no distinction in the rights and responsibilities of biological and adoptive parents, city lawyers argued today.

“There is no suggestion in any of the California statutes or cases governing parentage that same-sex couples are any less fit to be parents than opposite-sex couples or any policy preference for opposite-gendered parenting,” city lawyers wrote.

Since Proposition 8 didn't change any of those laws, the city lawyers argued, it “is not rationally related to legitimate government interests” in California.

“When you look at California laws governing families and parenting, the hypothetical reasons proponents offer to justify Proposition 8 just don't add up,” city attorney Dennis Herrera said. 

The city lawyers said they also support two broader arguments scheduled to be made in a separate brief due by midnight tonight from the two same-sex couples who filed the lawsuit decided by Walker.

Yusef Robb, a spokesman for the two couples' lawyers, said the plaintiffs' brief would be filed later tonight.

Those arguments are that Proposition 8 violates the federal constitutional rights of equal treatment and due process. Walker based his Aug. 4 decision on his conclusion that Proposition 8 violated those two constitutional guarantees.

But the city's argument that Proposition 8 is irrational under California law would offer the appeals court a narrower ground for upholding Proposition 8, in a ruling that might be restricted to California's situation.

Proposition 8 supporters have until Nov. 1 to file a reply to today's briefs.

A three-judge panel of the appeals court will hear the case during the week of Dec. 6. The date will be announced about six weeks beforehand, and the names of the judges will be announced about 10 days in advance.

Proposition 8, an amendment to the California Constitution, provides that “only marriage between a man and a woman is recognized or valid in California.”

Bay Area NewsLocalNEP

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Lakeshore Elementary School was closed in March shortly before SFUSD closed all schools due to coronavirus concerns. The district is now working to prepare all elementary schools to reopen by mid-January.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
School district preparing buildings for hybrid learning

SFUSD plans to use 72 elementary schools and 12 early education sites for first phase of reopening

There have been at least 142 confirmed cases of COVID-19 among workers at San Francisco International Airport. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supes back SFO worker healthcare legislation despite airline, business opposition

Costs of ‘Health Airport Ordinance’ in dispute, with estimates ranging from $8.4 M to $163 M annually

Thankfully, playgrounds that were closed due to the pandemic during the summer have reopened.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
The perils of parenting, COVID-style

At long last, it’s OK to take your little one out to play

Ten candidates are running for a seat on the Board of Trustees of the San Francisco Community College District.. (Courtesy photos)
Strong leadership needed as City College faces multiple crises

Ten candidates vying for four seats on CCSF board

City officials closed San Francisco County Jail No. 4 on the top floor of the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. in September, reducing the number of beds in the jail system by about 400. 
Kevin N. Hume/
S.F. Examiner
SF jail closure prompts doctor to call for release of more inmates

Reduced space increases risk of COVID-19 spreading among those in custody

Most Read