City policies hamper SFPD at housing projects

San Francisco police officers seeking to enforce trespassing laws in The City’s crime-plagued public housing projects face a legal tangle that prevents many from approaching the issue for fear they may end up face with a civil rights lawsuit.

Confusing statutes and unclear city policy conspire to keep police officers from enforcing trespassing laws in public housing projects, and even to prevent some from entering the areas, according to Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi.

Meanwhile, much of San Francisco’s crime happens in and around the troubled establishments. Three homicides have taken place this year near the intersection of Eddy and Laguna streets —the northeastern corner of Plaza East housing.

Much of the criminal activity in public housing projects comes from trespassers who loiter at the sites, Mirkarimi said in a hearing Monday at the Board of Supervisors Public Safety Committee. But police are tentative about enforcing trespassing laws because the laws are difficult to prosecute and arrests may backfire.

On March 6, Mayor Gavin Newsom, police Chief Heather Fong and other city officials held a news conference to announce an aggressive new patrol strategy that would focus on public housing sites.

Newsom and Fong announced that 28 beat officers would join 16 currently assigned to the “big four” San Francisco housing projects, which include Sunnydale, Potrero, Hunters Point and Alice Griffith, for a total of 44 cops patrolling projects citywide.

In a hearing before the Public Safety Committee, Officer John Hart, a department lawyer, said “more than mere presence” is required for a person to be breaking state trespassing laws. Police must prove criminal intent, destruction of no-trespassing signs or other specific acts in order to successfully bust trespassers.

Because of the vagaries of state trespassing laws, cities including Sacramento, San Diego and Los Angeles, have passed statutes addressing trespassing on public housing, Chief Assistant District Attorney Russ Giuntini said.

San Francisco lawmakers are considering a similar bill, but for now, only state laws apply.

amartin@examiner.com


How should police reduce crime at housing projects?

Share your comments below.

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

BART Ambassadors are being called on to assist riders in social situations that don’t require police force. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Unarmed BART ambassadors program formalized with a focus on community service

Public safety and police reform are key elements in campaigns of Board members Dufty and Simon

On Oct. 13, people lined up to vote early for the presidential election in Southlake, Texas. <ins>(Shutterstock)</ins>
<ins></ins>
Five things to watch for in the run-up to Nov. 3

Down-ballot races, as much as the presidency, will determine the future course of this nation

WeChat (Shutterstock)
U.S. District Court denies Trump request to shutdown WeChat app

A federal judge in San Francisco denied a request by the U.S.… Continue reading

School board members Gabriela Lopez (left) and Alison Collins (right) say they have been the subject of frequent hateful, racist and sexist attacks during their time on the school board. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F Examiner)
Angered by Lowell decision, SFUSD grad targets school board members with violent imagery

Facebook page depicts two women of color on board with swastikas and x-marks on their faces

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer, a former school board member, said it was ‘ridiculous’ that the school district did not yet have a plan to reopen. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supervisors demand SFUSD set a timeline for reopening

Pressure grows on district to resume in-person learning as The City’s COVID-19 case count goes down

Most Read