The Asian Art Museum has possessed a pair of 1,000 year old lintels from Thai religious sites since(Shutterstock)

The Asian Art Museum has possessed a pair of 1,000 year old lintels from Thai religious sites since(Shutterstock)

City, Asian Art Museum agree to return two Thai religious relics

Federal prosecutors announced Wednesday the settlement of a 2020 forfeiture action concerning two ancient relics from Thailand in the possession of the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco.

Under the settlement, the city of San Francisco and the museum will relinquish any claim to the objects so they may be returned to the Kingdom of Thailand.

The settlement, when fully implemented, will end more than 50 years of the museum’s possession of the historic pieces.

The objects at the center of the controversy are a pair of thousand-year-old lintels — architectural pieces positioned horizontally between vertical columns or supports — that came from two religious sites in Thailand.

In an interview when the complaint was originally filed, Zac Rose, a spokesperson for the museum, explained that the lintels — each weighing close to a ton — have been part of the museum’s collection since its opening in 1966, and were on public display for many years.

The museum is an agency of the city, according to Rose, and the collection and the museum are owned by the city. The San Francisco City Attorney’s Office represented the museum in the forfeiture action.

The conflict began in September 2016 when the Consul General of the Royal Thai General in Los Angeles visited the museum and saw the lintels on display, according to the government’s complaint. The consul general allegedly said he desired to see the lintels returned to Thailand.

Thereafter, the Thai Minister of Culture met with representatives of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in Thailand and said that “the lintels belonged to two ancient temples in Northeastern Thailand and were designated as cultural artifacts protected under the laws of Thailand since 1935,” according to the complaint.

The lintels were donated to the museum by an art collector referred to in the government’s complaint as “COLLECTOR 1,” who Rose identified as Avery Brundage, the former head of the International Olympic Committee.

Brundage was a wealthy collector of East Asian art and the “founding donor” of the museum, to which he donated more than 7,000 pieces from his collection.

Brundage’s bust was prominently displayed at the museum until 2020, when it was taken down due to his record of racist, sexist and anti-Semitic beliefs, according to Rose.

“It just didn’t reflect our mission and our vision and our values as a public institution. We are trying to live our values,” he said.

The forfeiture complaint alleged that exporting the lintels from Thailand violated Thai law. Under U.S. law, the lintels “constitute stolen, smuggled, and/or clandestinely imported or introduced merchandise,” according to the government.

Rose said that upon learning of the Thai claim in 2017, the museum put the lintels in storage and gave the U.S. Department of Homeland Security access to the objects and the related records “so they could do their provenance research and understand the history of ownership.”

Thereafter, the museum decided to return the lintels to Thailand and in 2018 began the process of “deaccessioning” the works, Rose said.

The process went slowly, according to Rose, because “It’s a very, very complex thing. Museums are complex organizations. And because we’re a city agency, we also have a very, very strict set of tenets and governance laws and it requires multiple committees to approve it.”

According to Rose, the museum has been moving forward since 2018 to do all the things necessary to deaccession the works, and to identify a Thai partner to take possession.

The stipulation of settlement recognizes that “The deaccessioning process, while not legally required, comports with the protocols and procedures in place at the Asian Art Museum and the parties agree are appropriate in this matter.”

The parties further stipulated that “upon completion of the deaccessioning process, [the city] will relinquish all right, title, and interest in the defendant properties and… said properties shall be forfeited to the United States and disposed of according to law.”

The settlement gives the museum until April 9 to complete the deaccessioning process and provides that if it is not completed by that date, the forfeiture action will resume.

Bay Area NewsCrimemuseumsan francisco news

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at

Just Posted

San Francisco Symphony Music Director Esa-Pekka Salonen and members of the orchestra were thrilled to be back inside Davies Symphony Hall on May 6 in a program for first responders featuring string works by Jean Sibelius, George Walker, Carl Nielsen, Caroline Shaw and Edward Grieg. (Courtesy Stefan Cohen/San Francisco Symphony)
SF Symphony makes joyful return to Davies Hall

Esa-Pekka Salonen conducts program for first responders and community leaders

Students in an after-school community hub move quickly through a social circle as they play a game at the Mission YMCA on Friday, May 7, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Parents scramble for ‘Summer Together’ spaces

City program offering free camps sees high demand, confusion over enrollment

Calfire (Shutterstock)
Wildfires burn around Northern California during first red flag weekend of the year

Firefighters around the region battled wildfires all day Saturday, starting less than… Continue reading

The Port of San Francisco, which controls much of the The City’s waterfront, faces potential layoffs due to a financial crisis caused by the pandemic. 
Steven Ho/
Special to S.F. Examiner
In a financial ‘crisis,’ SF Port officials lobby for stimulus funding

Looking to right their financial ship, Port of San Francisco officials are… Continue reading

Legislation introduced by Assemblymember Phil Ting has expanded the range of people who can request a gun violence restraining order against someone. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Use of gun violence restraining orders continues to rise

For the fourth year in a row, the number of gun violence… Continue reading

Most Read