Burlingame to keep footing sidewalk bill

In response to a growing number of disgruntled residents billed by the city to repair damaged sidewalks in front of their homes, the City Council voted 5-0 Monday to delay implementing a sidewalk-repair program, which charges hundreds of dollars to fix the city’s walkways.

The program will be delayed by a year; residents will not be charged for sidewalk repairs this year.

City Manager Jim Nantell on Monday requested the delay in collecting funds from residents because of a proposed state constitutional amendment, SCA 12, which would allow cities to collect fees for storm-drain maintenance. Currently, cities can collect fees for only garbage and sewer costs.

The proposed amendment — authored by Sens. Leland Yee, D-San Mateo/San Francisco, and Tom Torlakson, D-Antioch — would give cities the means to pay for aging storm-drainage systems. The millions spent on system repairs paid out of the city’s pocket could then be spent on other needs, such as sidewalk repairs. The amendment is on the Senate floor; it is unclear when a vote will take place.

If the amendment does not pass, City Council members said one option to raise funds for sidewalk repairs would be to increase the hotel tax. A decision, however, would not be made till 2008.

Although residents acknowledge that most Peninsula cities bill residents for sidewalk repair, they add that Burlingame trees are the culprit for mangled sidewalks and are the city’s responsibility.

“Ninety percent of the trouble is that the trees that belong to the city — their roots are causing the sidewalks to buckle,” said Scotty Morris, a Ralston Avenue resident.

Sidewalk repair fees began in 2004, with the city billing residents on a year-by-year basis. In 2005, residents paid a total of about $80,000, either to the city or through a private contractor, Nantell said, with most residents paying about $400 per repair job. In 2006, the city did not issue any bills. This year, however, residents have been asked to pay about $600 for repairs. Corner houses would pay significantly more since they have a larger sidewalk area to contend with.

Jean, a resident on Clarendon Road who declined to give her last name, said the idea of charging homeowners is “a bunch of crap,” she said. “I’m afraid someone will trip out here. I have no idea who they would sue. They would probably sue me.”

bfoley@examiner.com


Would you pay to have your city sidewalks fixed?

Share your comments below.

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

CCSF puts Fort Mason campus on the chopping block

Faced with severe budget cuts, community college preparing to end decades-long lease

Neighbors sue city over safe camping site planned for Stanyan Street

A group of Haight residents filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking a federal… Continue reading

Man accused of killing 94-year-old Glen Park resident has troubled past

Neighbors had complained about ‘paranoid and aggressive behavior’

Newsom says rules for reopening California fitness centers coming ‘in a week or so’

By Phil Willon Los Angeles Times Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday said… Continue reading

Fishermen, port struggling to recover from Pier 45 fire

Loss to fishing industry alone could be in the millions

Most Read