Brisbane quarry campaign heats up

Both sides accuse the other of public misinformation

BRISBANE — Charges of misinformation are being lobbed by both sides in the fight over a proposed redevelopment of the Guadalupe Valley Quarry.

On Nov. 7 Brisbane voters will vote on Measure B, which would allow 173 residential units along with a community facility, public park and open space, among other things, at what is now the Guadalupe Valley Quarry.

A heated campaign has emerged due to the project’s size and potential environmental impact in the area.

A main point of debate has centered on a 1991 property agreement between Brisbane and California Rock & Asphalt to build a business park at the site. A subsequent 1995 San Mateo County surface mining permit includes the business park proposal as part of the reclamation plan should the quarry close.

The “NoQuarry Housing” advocates believe that the 1991 agreement — as reflected in the 1995 surface mining permit awarded by San Mateo County — has capped the amount of rock that can be extracted at roughly 6.4 million tons, which the quarry is approaching, and the quarry would be non-compliant if it extracted more than that. Operations will have to cease at the quarry if Measure B is not approved, they argue.

Michele Salmon, the co-chair of the campaign against Measure B, said the 6.4-million-ton limit was listed in the surface mining permit and holds the quarry accountable.

“(California Rock & Asphalt) wants us to approve this so they can get more profit out of the mountain,” Salmon said. “I don’t think it’s an economically viable business anymore.”

Those in favor of the development project tucked under San Bruno Mountain, however, say the 1991 agreement, which called for 6,455,014 tons of rock to be removed to provide the proper elevation for the proposed business park, is “irrelevant,” namely because a project application for a business park was never filed.

Brisbane City Attorney Hal Toppel said that what everyone “seems to be missing” is that if the agreement to build a business park at the quarry is not implemented then the 6.4-million ton cap can be changed, as stated in the mining permit.

“For someone to vote ‘no’ because they think it will close the quarry, that is simply not a justifiable assumption at this point,” Toppel said. “As far as I’m concerned, the property agreement has not been implemented because no action has been taken to proceed” with the business park.

Project advocates add that while technically the conditions of approval in the 1995 surface mining permit still stand and they’re beholden to not withdrawing more than 6.4 million tons, there’s an understanding with the county and state that until the end-use of the quarry, either development or continued quarrying, is determined, a new permit and reclamation plan is not needed.

Mignone Wood, a land-use consultant specializing in quarries who works with California Rock & Asphalt, said the permit is currently still valid and the quarry is still bound by the conditions of approval — the 6.4 million tonnage — but added that the quarry is still compliance with the permit.

She called the number “irrelevant” because the county is currently letting the permit “float” until the end-use, a residential development or continued quarrying, is decided Nov. 7. If the measure fails, the quarry will simply seek a new permit with an updated reclamation plan.

“What I’m very frustrated about is I want the voters of Brisbane to vote on a project where the facts are represented,” said Owen Poole, a project consultant.

dsmith@examiner.comBay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Many famillies have supported keeping John F. Kennedy Drive in Golden Gate Park free of car traffic. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Fight over future of JFK Drive heats up

Shamann Walton compares accessibilty issues to segregation, likens street closure to ‘1950s South’

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, pictured in March, is unveiling a series of budget proposals this week. (Al Seib/Los Angeles Times/TNS)
Newsom’s school plan has billions for college savings accounts, after school programs and more

Hannah Wiley The Sacramento Bee California Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to send… Continue reading

Tara Hobson, center, principal at SF International High School, welcomes a student back on Monday, April 26, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SFUSD seniors get a chance to say goodbye to school in person

Deal to briefly return older students to school leaves many parents and teens dissatisfied

Forward Andrew Wiggins hits a layback jumper to protect the lead late in the fourth quarter as the Golden State Warriors take on the Phoenix Suns at Chase Center on Tuesday, May 11, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Wiggins erupts for 38 points as Warriors rally past Suns 122-116

A night after beating the NBA-leading Utah Jazz, the Golden State Warriors… Continue reading

A tent sits on the sidewalk at Hayes and Laguna streets in Hayes Valley on Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Gavin Newsom wants to spend billions to fight homelessness in California

Hannah Wiley The Sacramento Bee California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced on Tuesday… Continue reading

Most Read