Bridge sponsorship proposal goes before board today

A move to allow partial corporate sponsorship of the Golden Gate Bridge will go before the bridge’s board of directors as an informational presentation today instead of a vote.

The plan, essentially, is to allow the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District to accept about $4 million in corporate money in exchange for allowing the placement of logos in specified areas of the bridge’s visitor’s center and other locations not on the bridge itself.

The district and its consultant, Novato-based Sponsorship Strategies LLP, say naming rights will not be given up, nor will advertising be allowed on the bridge. Some groups and politicians worry that the sponsorship plan could start the bridge district down a slippery slope.

“While we understand that the district is not planning to sell naming rights to the bridge or place advertising on the span, we remain extremely concerned that any attempt to commercialize the bridge will tarnish its beauty and value,” Marcie Keever, program director for San Francisco Beautiful, said at an Aug. 25 meeting.

The board initially heard the proposal as a presentation to the Governmental Affairs and Public Information Committee, which voted to send the plan to the board as a whole, originally scheduled for today. However, that hearing was rescheduled to Oct. 26 and an informational presentation was scheduled in its place.

After the August meeting, Supervisor Jake McGoldrick, who represents the Richmond district and sits on the bridge’s board of directors, introduced legislation at City Hall in an attempt to block the sponsorship bid. That legislation has not yet been voted on by the Board of Supervisors.

The bridge district is seeking public comment on the sponsorship plan. The presentation is available on the district’s Web site, at www.goldengatebridge.org. Comments can be sent to bridgecomments@goldengate.org.

amartin@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Lakeshore Elementary School was closed in March shortly before SFUSD closed all schools due to coronavirus concerns. The district is now working to prepare all elementary schools to reopen by mid-January.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
School district preparing buildings for hybrid learning

SFUSD plans to use 72 elementary schools and 12 early education sites for first phase of reopening

There have been at least 142 confirmed cases of COVID-19 among workers at San Francisco International Airport. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supes back SFO worker healthcare legislation despite airline, business opposition

Costs of ‘Health Airport Ordinance’ in dispute, with estimates ranging from $8.4 M to $163 M annually

Thankfully, playgrounds that were closed due to the pandemic during the summer have reopened.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
The perils of parenting, COVID-style

At long last, it’s OK to take your little one out to play

Ten candidates are running for a seat on the Board of Trustees of the San Francisco Community College District.. (Courtesy photos)
Strong leadership needed as City College faces multiple crises

Ten candidates vying for four seats on CCSF board

City officials closed San Francisco County Jail No. 4 on the top floor of the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. in September, reducing the number of beds in the jail system by about 400. 
Kevin N. Hume/
S.F. Examiner
SF jail closure prompts doctor to call for release of more inmates

Reduced space increases risk of COVID-19 spreading among those in custody

Most Read