Board postpones vote on Doyle Drive

The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District's Board of Directors postponed voting today on the controversial proposal regarding a toll to pay for reconstruction of Doyle Drive.

District spokeswoman Mary Currie said the board voted 10-8 to continue a vote on the issue but no date was set for that vote. Board members did not agree on how the Doyle Drive reconstruction should be financed, Currie said.

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority wants to get legislative authority to implement and collect a toll so it can qualify for $158.7 million in federal funding for the $810 million project. The Transportation Authority asked the District to support its efforts to get the legislative approval.

The District's Board of Directors today considered a resolution that neither supported or opposed the toll and the District insists it does not have the authority to grant anyone the right to collect tolls.

The resolution states any toll must be imposed on all users of Doyle Drive, not just motorists who enter San Francisco across the Golden Gate Bridge.

The resolution also states the toll must be collected at other locations other than the Golden Gate Bridge and that toll revenue should also be used to provide alternatives to single-occupant automobiles on Doyle Drive.

Currie said the board members did not vote today on an alternate resolution proposed by First Vice President Al Boro. That resolution opposes the use of tolls to pay for the Doyle Drive project and it states financing the Doyle Drive project is the state of California's responsibility. Boro's motion was introduced but the motion to continue the matter tookprecedence, Currie said.

Some opponents of the toll claim Marin and Sonoma County commuters will pay two tolls to enter San Francisco, one to cross the Golden Gate Bridge and one to travel on Doyle Drive.

The District board's resolution states only six percent of daily traffic downtown to downtown San Francisco enters from the Golden Gate Bridge corridor.

San Francisco Police Commissioner Joe Alioto Veronese urged the District's board to oppose any toll that primarily affects Marin and Sonoma counties' commuters. He said the toll plan poses “a significant risk of legal challenges.”

Veronese is a Democratic candidate in the State senate's District 3 that includes San Francisco, Marin and Sonoma counties.

Mike Kerns, chairman of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors and a District board member, said he's against a toll on Doyle Drive because it would affect Marin and Sonoma county commuters and that the state should pay for reconstruction of Doyle Drive, a state highway.

Kerns said the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which also is seeking legislative authority for a toll, intends to asked for an extension beyond March 31 when the authority to collect the toll must be in place. He said he hopes the Bay Area's federal representatives can help find other federal funding for the Doyle Drive reconstruction.

Bay City News

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Bill to create state public bank could jumpstart SF efforts

California may move $10 billion of its investment banking funds to rebuild… Continue reading

State hires firefighters as wildfire season begins

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday outlined the steps California has taken to… Continue reading

Supes to vote on proposal to ease restrictions on gay bathhouses

Mandelman hopes to ‘make the operation of adult sex venues more feasible.’

Breed, Walton test negative for COVID-19 after exposure to the virus

Mayor London Breed announced Thursday she tested negative for COVID-19 after notified… Continue reading

‘No timetable’ for cable car return, SFMTA says

How the temporary absence of cable cars means more than just a loss of transit routes

Most Read