Board passes Bayview redevelopment plan

Despite concerns that African-American residents would be displaced in a major neighborhood overhaul, the Board of Supervisors voted to approve a $188 million redevelopment plan for Bayview-Hunters Point on Tuesday.

If the plan is given final approval next week, 1,300 acres in The City’s southeast area — from south of Cesar Chavez Street and east of Highway 101 to the Bayshore area — will be designated as a redevelopment zone. Conferred upon areas determined to be blighted, state redevelopment status allows San Francisco’s Redevelopment Agency to use the area’s property taxes to fund improvements.

Changes within the scope of the 30-year plan include the rehabilitation of historic buildings, business façade improvements, traffic calming devices, park and street improvements and the construction of 3,700 housing units, one-fourth of which will be priced for low-income families.

In the works for nearly a decade, the plan has divided the area’s residents, some of whom say the area desperately needs business renewal, better housing and safer neighborhoods. Others point to an infamous redevelopment effort in the 1960s that pushed The City’s African-American population out of the Fillmore District as proof that such plans often result in other populations taking over the improved area.

City officials, including Supervisor Sophie Maxwell, who has championed the redevelopment plan, say restrictions on eminent domain land seizures, new amendments that provide for citizen oversight and a city audit of the project as it progresses will serve to protect the existing local community.

“I believe we’re a different city than we were 40 years ago,” Supervisor Bevan Dufty said before voting for the plan.

Supervisor Tom Ammiano, who voted against it, said there were too many unanswered questions that could lead to unintended consequences for the area in the future.

“I think they’re trying to do something that is very good, but I just have deep concerns,” Ammiano said. “Even though it’s been nine years [since project plans first began], I feel this is somewhat hasty when you consider the scale and the breadth of this.”

Maxwell responded sharply to Ammiano’s comments. Without calling him out by name, she said veteran board members should be “ashamed” for not doing more to help the dilapidated high-crime area.

“If you’ve been so interested in Bayview, why does it look the way it does now?” she said.

The plan passed on a 6-3 vote, with two supervisors absent.

beslinger@examiner.com

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Big name officials crowd race for tiny Democratic Party board

The San Francisco Democratic Party campaign clown car is rollin’ once again.… Continue reading

Legal challenge halts SFPD jurisdiction over dog attacks on federal land

Dog owners beware — canine attacks are now consequence-free on federal land… Continue reading

New drug court hearing for man who ate cookie without permission

The San Francisco Public Defender’s Office will ask the San Francisco Superior… Continue reading

49ers battle with the Saints lives up to its billing

Kittle’s 39-yard catch-and-run had placed San Francisco in prime position for a game-winning field goal as the 49ers trailed 46-45

SF police shoot burglary suspect in Mission District

Man allegedly attacked officers before being shot in first on-duty SFPD shooting since June 2018

Most Read