Belmont fires up citywide smoking ban

A clearly divided City Council narrowly approved an incendiary smoking ordinance despite protests from members of the Belmont business community.

Belmont’s smoking ban, approved in a 3-2 vote with Councilman Bill Dickenson and Vice Mayor Warren Lieberman dissenting, will reduce the already dwindling number of places puffers can light up and declare secondhand smoke a public nuisance.

Councilman Phil Mathewson called the ordinance “perfect,’ but Dickenson and Lieberman both said it took the wrong approach.

“Telling business owners how to operate is not how I’m going to legislate,” Dickenson said. “I think we should have focused a lot more on the education piece instead of the legislative piece.”

Lieberman and Dickenson both said the city should have focused more on educating the public about the hazards of smoking.

Under the new ordinance, smoking is prohibited in work places except for smoking shops operated by a single person. It is to be banned from common areas in any multi-unit residents and any homes that share common floors or ceilings with other homes.

Landlords in Belmont must also now insert no-smoking terms in their residential leases. All residential smoking provisions will go into effect 14 months after the adoption of the ordinance.

Smoking is allowed in a number of areas still, including single family and detached homes, designated smoking areas, personal vehicles and streets and sidewalks unless they’re being used as workplaces or for city-sponsored events.

Enforcement of the ordinance will be complaint-driven, much like Belmont’s noise ordinance, and first-time offenders will be issued a notice. If interested, offenders can be referred to programs to help them stop smoking. Furtherviolations could entail legal or criminal actions.

“The goal of this ordinance is compliance, not punishment,” said City Attorney Marc Zafferano.

The ordinance will be on the consent agenda at the Sept. 25 Belmont City Council meeting, at 7:30 p.m. in Council Chambers. Unless opposition rises then, the ordinance will become law 30 days later. It will also be reviewed one year from the adoption date.

jgoldman@examiner.com

Voice your opinion and vote in our poll at examiNation SF: How do you feel about a city making it illegal to smoke in your own home?

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Mayor London Breed said Tuesday that with other counties moving ahead with expanding vaccine eligibility “we want San Franciscans to have the same opportunity.” (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Everyone in SF ages 16 and up is now eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine

San Francisco expanded eligibility for the COVID-19 vaccine Tuesday to everyone ages… Continue reading

San Francisco Park Rangers have seen their budget and staffing levels increase significantly since 2014. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Citations for being in SF’s public parks after midnight soar

Data shows disproportionate impact on Black residents

Parents and students line up socially distanced before the first day of in-person learning at Bret Harte Elementary School on Monday, April 12, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
‘It’s a beautiful sight’: The first students return to the classroom

San Francisco’s youngest public school students stepped into classrooms for in-person learning… Continue reading

File
Latest Breed nominee for Police Commission moves forward

Immigration attorney Jim Byrne clears Board of Supervisors committee

A rally at Golden Gate Park on Sunday April 11 drew a large crowd in support of calls to keep JFK Drive closed to traffic. (Emily Huston/Special to the S.F. Examiner)
Hundreds rally for “JFK Thrive,” not JFK Drive

By Emily Huston More than two hundred gathered on a warm Sunday… Continue reading

Most Read