Ayres' attorney claims police overstepped bounds

The defense attorney for William Ayres, the San Mateo child psychiatrist accused of molesting seven young boys while under his care, will seek to invalidate a search warrant that led to Ayres’ arrest, which could derail the current criminal charges against him.

Doron Weinberg, Ayres’ attorney, claims investigators overstepped bounds in March 2006, when San Mateo police obtained a search warrant to confiscate files with some 700 patient names from a storage locker belonging to Ayres. Investigators used the files to search for patientswho were allegedly molested by Ayres after 1988. These alleged abuses would fall within the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution. Weinberg says using private files to contact a broad group of people violates the doctor-patient privilege.

“The privilege cannot be breached unless there is a clear public need and in this case, roaming around town trying to find patients does not justify the need,” Weinberg said.

Ayres, 75, faces 21 counts of lewd and lascivious acts for allegedly molesting seven boys who were patients between 1991 and 1996. About 30 other men have claimed to be alleged victims in the 1970s and early ’80s, which would fall outside the statute of limitations, Deputy District Attorney Melissa McKowan said.

In July 2005, Ayres settled a civil lawsuit for an undisclosed amount with a former patient, who accused him of allegedly molesting him in the 1970s. The settlement included Ayres denying the accusations. The suit propelled a police investigation in which police obtained a warrant to collect the files used to contact former patients, according to San Mateo police Capt. Mike Callagy. Ayres was arrested April 5 and is free on $750,000 bail.

Weinberg’s questioning of the legality of the search warrant rests on a 1988 state appellate court ruling that restricts law enforcement from using doctors’ files to contact patients. That case also involved a retired psychiatrist accused of sexual molestation.

Dean Johnson, a former San Mateo County prosecutor who observes high-profile cases, said a judge would have to weigh doctor-patient privilege over the importance of the investigation. McKowan declined to say whether the alleged victims were located as a result of the search warrant. She added that “it’s always a possibility” more victims will be named in the criminal case.

Weinberg said the case’s publicity has influenced former patients into mistakenly thinking they were abused while under Ayres’ care. In an interview with The Examiner in 2006, Ayres denied molesting patients but said he conducted full-body examinations.

The case’s next court date is June 28 for a preliminary hearing.

bfoley@examiner.com

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Lawmaker introduces legislation to kick off creation of Bay Bridge bus lane

Assemblymember Rob Bonta’ s placeholder bill would create ‘sustainable, efficient’ public transit

Student walkout at Aptos highlights concerns about bullying

More than 100 students walked out of Aptos Middle School Friday morning… Continue reading

Thousands of orchids on display at Golden Gate Park

Nearly 30,000 orchids filled the County Fair building at Golden Gate Park… Continue reading

SFUSD educators hit with layoff warning

Superintendent says district faces budget shortfall, depleted reserves

SF to provide $350K to help struggling nonprofit care for youth in crisis

City stopped sending clients to Edgewood Center after sexual abuse allegations emerged

Most Read