Architectural consulltants Dr. Sauer & Partners Corporation reportedly overcharged The City for work on the Central Subway. (Jessica Christian/2014 S.F. Examiner file photo)

Architectural consulltants Dr. Sauer & Partners Corporation reportedly overcharged The City for work on the Central Subway. (Jessica Christian/2014 S.F. Examiner file photo)

Architect consultant on Central Subway overcharged SF, fiscal review finds

An architectural consultant for the Central Subway project overcharged The City, according to a review of the project’s finances.

The Office of the Controller’s City Services Auditor Division released a report Wednesday alleging Dr. Sauer & Partners Corporation must reduce the amount it billed the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency.

The review of three consultant contracts was conducted by Sjoberg Evashenk Consulting, which was hired by the Controller’s Office. The review was classified as a “desk review,” the report’s authors wrote, which is considered “substantially less in scope than an examination or audit.”

Dr. Sauer & Partners, an architectural consultant specializing in tunnels and underground facilities, may owe the SFMTA as much as $24,483 due to its miscalculations, according to the Controller’s Office report.

Though the report stated “this amount does not represent the actual recovery amount due to SFMTA, which will be determined by SFMTA at the time of the final contract cost review,” SFMTA spokesperson Paul Rose said the final amount would likely not change.

The Central Subway project is the largest transit project under construction in San Francisco, and will more directly link Chinatown to The City’s southeastern neighborhoods.

The review was conducted because $948 million — more than half of the Central Subway project’s total $1.58 billion budget — is funded by the Federal Transit Administration. Therefore, the report states, “SFMTA has a fiduciary responsibility to ensure project expenses follow applicable federal rules and regulations.”

SFMTA staffer and Central Subway Program Director John Funghi responded to the review in a letter, which was included in the report.

“It is important to note that the Central Subway Program will implement the new overhead rates and will work with all three firms to determine the reconciled overhead amount,” Funghi wrote.

The report found Dr. Sauer & Partners “mostly complied” with The City’s contract terms, but incorrectly calculated its ground transportation and car lease costs.

The consultants did not keep mileage logs to distinguish between personal or professional use of its vehicles. This lack of data prompted Sjoberg Evashenk to “disallow” the cost of the consultants’ transportation.

In a response, Dr. Sauer & Partners wrote to the Controller’s Office that they reviewed the report and have “no comment or objections.”

Sjoberg Evashenk approved rates of two other consultants to the Central Subway project were evaluated: MCK Associates and Butler Enterprise Group. Central SubwayCity Controller's OfficeMunireviewSFMTATransit

Just Posted

A felled tree in Sydney G. Walton Square blocks part of a lane on Front Street following Sunday’s storm on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
After the rain: What San Francisco learned from a monster storm

Widespread damage underscored The City’s susceptibility to heavy wind and rain

Plan Bay Area 2050 is an expansive plan guiding the region’s growth and development over the next three decades. The regional plan addresses progressive policy priorities like a universal basic income and a region-wide rent cap, alongside massive new spending on affordable housing and transportation infrastructure. (Shutterstock)
$1.4 trillion ‘blueprint’ would address Bay Area’s housing, transit woes

Analyzing the big ticket proposals in ‘Plan Bay Area 2050’

A felled tree in San Francisco is pictured on Fillmore Street following a major storm that produced high winds and heavy rains on Oct. 24, 2021. (Photo courtesy of Philip Ford)
Storm updates: Rainiest October day in San Francisco history

Rainfall exceeded 10 inches in parts of the Bay Area

On Sunday, California bore the brunt of what meteorologists referred to as a bomb cyclone and an atmospheric river, a convergence of storms that brought more than half a foot of rain to parts of the Bay Area, along with high winds, concerns about flash floods and the potential for heavy snow in the Sierra Nevada. Much of the Bay Area was under a flash flood watch on Sunday, with the National Weather Service warning of the potential for mudslides across the region. (NOAA via The New York Times)
Bomb cyclone, atmospheric river combine to pummel California with rain and wind

What you need to know about this historic weather event

The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
The Department of Building Inspection, at 49 South Van Ness Ave., has been mired in scandal since its creation by voter referendum under Proposition G in 1994. (Courtesy SF.gov)
Whistleblowing hasn’t worked at the SF Dept. of Building Inspection

DBI inspectors say their boss kept them off connected builders’ projects

Most Read