A San Francisco handgun ban approved by city voters in 2005 was overturned by a state appeals court Wednesday.
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal in San Francisco said the measure, known as Proposition H, conflicted with state laws regulating handguns.
The court ruled in a lawsuit filed by the National Rifle Association, four firearms rights groups and seven individuals to challenge the ban.
The measure, which never went into effect, would have barred almost all city residents from possessing handguns and prohibited all residents from selling, manufacturing or distributing the firearms within the city.
Exceptions would have been allowed for possession by law enforcement officers and others such as security guards who need guns for professional purposes.
Thompson said, “We are disappointed in the decision, particularly with the continuing plague of handgun violence in San Francisco. We are currently looking at the ruling and evaluating our options.”
The city argued that it was entitled to pass the measure to address the local problem of gun violence and protect residents’ welfare and safety.
But Justice Ignazio Ruvolo wrote for the appeals panel that a “comprehensive montage” of state laws on gun sales, licensing and registration was intended to balance competing interests.
Ruvolo wrote, “These laws of statewide application reflect the Legislature’s balancing of interests – on the one side, the interest of the general public to be protected from the criminal misuse of firearms, on the other, the interests of law-abiding citizens to purchase and use firearms to deter crime, to help police fight crime, to defend themselves and for hunting and certain recreational purposes.”
The panel noted that the California Supreme Court has upheld some limited local regulation of guns, such as county bans on gun shows or sales on county fair property.
But the appeals court cautioned that “when it comes to regulating firearms, local governments are well advised to tread lightly.”