Appeals court overturns S.F. gun ban

A San Francisco handgun ban approved by city voters in 2005 was overturned by a state appeals court Wednesday.

A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal in San Francisco said the measure, known as Proposition H, conflicted with state laws regulating handguns.

The court ruled in a lawsuit filed by the National Rifle Association, four firearms rights groups and seven individuals to challenge the ban.

It upheld a similar ruling in which San Francisco Superior Court Judge James Warren found in 2006 that state laws pre-empted the local ordinance.

The measure, which never went into effect, would have barred almost all city residents from possessing handguns and prohibited all residents from selling, manufacturing or distributing the firearms within the city.

Exceptions would have been allowed for possession by law enforcement officers and others such as security guards who need guns for professional purposes.

Alexis Thompson, a spokeswoman for City Attorney Dennis Herrera, said no decision has been made on whether to appeal further to the California Supreme Court.

Thompson said, “We are disappointed in the decision, particularly with the continuing plague of handgun violence in San Francisco. We are currently looking at the ruling and evaluating our options.”

The city argued that it was entitled to pass the measure to address the local problem of gun violence and protect residents’ welfare and safety.

But Justice Ignazio Ruvolo wrote for the appeals panel that a “comprehensive montage” of state laws on gun sales, licensing and registration was intended to balance competing interests.

Ruvolo wrote, “These laws of statewide application reflect the Legislature’s balancing of interests – on the one side, the interest of the general public to be protected from the criminal misuse of firearms, on the other, the interests of law-abiding citizens to purchase and use firearms to deter crime, to help police fight crime, to defend themselves and for hunting and certain recreational purposes.”

The panel noted that the California Supreme Court has upheld some limited local regulation of guns, such as county bans on gun shows or sales on county fair property.

But the appeals court cautioned that “when it comes to regulating firearms, local governments are well advised to tread lightly.”

Bay City News

Bay Area NewsLocal

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The sidewalk on Egbert Avenue in the Bayview recently was cluttered with car parts, tires and other junk. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
New surveillance effort aims to crack down on illegal dumping

’We want to make sure we catch people who are trashing our streets’

The recall election for California Gov. Gavin Newsom is scheduled for Sept. 14. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
SF could play a big role in overcoming Democrat apathy, driving voter turnout for Newsom

San Francisco voters are not used to swaying elections. Just think of… Continue reading

Health care workers treat a Covid-19 patient who needs to be intubated before being put on a ventilator at Providence St. Mary Medical Center during a surge of cases in Apple Valley, Dec. 17, 2020. Confronted with surging infections, California became the first state in the country to mandate coronavirus vaccines or testing for state employees and health-care workers. (Ariana Drehsler/The New York Times)
In California, a mix of support and resistance to new vaccine rules

By Shawn Hubler, Livia Albeck-Ripka and Soumya Karlamangla New York Times SACRAMENTO… Continue reading

Dave Hodges, pastor at Zide Door, the Church of Entheogenic Plants that include marijuana and psilocybin mushrooms, holds some psychedelic mushrooms inside the Oakland church on Friday, July 22, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Psychedelic spirituality: Inside a growing Bay Area religious movement

‘They are guiding us into something ineffable’

Most Read