America’s Cup: Boon or bust?

Will the yachting extravaganza The City hopes to host bee a boon or a bust for San Francisco’s bootom line?

As with situations in the City by the Bay, it turns out that all depends on whom you ask.

On Friday, two dueling reports were released about the potential fiscal impact of an America’s Cup race hosted by San Francisco. One expects the race to generate about $88.1 million for The City, while the other expects the city to lose more than $101.4 million.

A mere $189.5 million difference in opinion.

Outgoing Mayor Gavin Newsom’s administration has been vying for The City to be chosen as the host of the international America’s Cup yachting race in 2013, after the previous race was won by the yachting team funded by Bay Area billionaire Larry Ellison. The team now has the right to choose the host city for the next race, and has claimed two other cities are preparing bids, though no other cities have come forward.

Newsom’s staff has touted the race as a major moneymaker for San Francisco, but that claim was deflated by a report released last month by the office of legislative budget analyst Harvey Rose. That report determined that both The City’s and its Port would be required to shoulder huge expenses.

In the early hours of Friday morning, Rose’s office offered a second, updated report. By mid-morning, the Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development had released another report with a far different conclusion.

Here are a few of the differences between the reports:

  • The Mayor’s report counts on $32 million in privately raised funding to offset city costs, while Rose’s report points out that this money is by no means guaranteed;
  • The mayor’s report counts about $30 million in long-term increased value on port land, while Rose’s report notes that that increased value will almost solely benefit the developers, rather than the Port;
  • The mayor’s report considers potential long-term increased tax revenue, while Rose’s report states that future tax revenue will be passed to developers;

Which assessment is more accurate will surely be a subject of serious debate at the Board of Supervisor’s Budget and Finance Committee meeting Wednesday.

kworth@sfexaminer.com

Bay Area NewsLarry EllisonLocalSan FranciscoTransittransportation

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Planning Commission greenlights 1,100 unit Balboa Reservoir project

Development near CCSF expected to include 50 percent below-market rate units

Breed announces timeline for when SF’s businesses can reopen after COVID-19 shutdown

Restaurant advocacy group wants The City to allow indoor dining sooner

Trump signs order targeting social media companies

By Chris Megerian Los Angeles Times President Donald Trump signed an executive… Continue reading

CCSF puts Fort Mason campus on the chopping block

Faced with severe budget cuts, community college preparing to end decades-long lease

Neighbors sue city over safe camping site planned for Stanyan Street

A group of Haight residents filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking a federal… Continue reading

Most Read