Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos – pictured testifying via video at a congressional hearing in July 2020 – recently announced a program in which Amazon is seeding $2 billion in funding for affordable housing. (Graeme Jennings-Pool/Getty Images/via Tribune News Service)

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos – pictured testifying via video at a congressional hearing in July 2020 – recently announced a program in which Amazon is seeding $2 billion in funding for affordable housing. (Graeme Jennings-Pool/Getty Images/via Tribune News Service)

Amazon may not be all evil

Online giant is helping funding affordable housing in three cities

.

It came as a small blip, unable to compete with the rest of the apocalyptic news cycle, but last week Amazon, Seattle’s favorite harbinger of evil, did something good. Really good.

Whatever you think of the world’s second-richest person (shout out to Elon Musk for edging ahead in the latest CNBC flaunt-the-wealth tabulation), however much time you’ve spent over the past decade lobbing darts at a photo of Jeff Bezos, it’s hard to look at the latest news coming from Amazon with the usual outrage.

Let’s talk about that news.

Last week, the world’s largest online retailer, destroyer of the human shopping experience, announced it had created something called the “Amazon Housing Equity Fund,” which is designed to address affordable housing crises in its three stronghold cities, Seattle, Nashville and Arlington, Va. Amazon committed to spending $2 billion to seed the fund. So far, $567 million of the fund has already been earmarked for projects in each of the three target cities.

In Washington State, Amazon has partnered with the King County Housing Authority, offering $161.5 million in low-interest loans (with sweetheart terms) and $24 million in grants to purchase and preserve low-income housing in the Puget Sound Region.

So far the partners have purchased three apartment buildings, totaling 470 units, in Bellevue, a one-time Seattle bedroom community that has, over the past few decades, become a city in its own right. Units are available to those making 80 percent (or less) of the area median. Ultimately, the partnership between Amazon and the Housing Authority plans to create or preserve approximately 1,500 housing units in the area.

Likewise does Amazon have big plans in Northern Virginia, home to 1,000 Amazon jobs that were turned away from Long Island City, Queens. The fund has already committed $381.9 million to the Washington Housing Conservancy, which is using the funds to convert 1,300 market-rate units at the massive Crystal House high-rise (in the Crystal City area) into affordable housing. Units will be made available to renters earning less than 80 percent of the area median income. Plans in Nashville are not yet concrete, though Amazon has already donated $2 million to The Housing Fund, a local non-profit.

By 2025, the fund will have created or preserved 20,000 affordable units between now and 2025, which seems like pretty big news to me; and yet, reaction has been, so far, muted. Amazon and its executives have proudly and understandably flooded social media with announcements, but comments on their posts have been few and have included several designed to retrofit the announcement to fit into the popular “Jeff Bezos is Satan, Amazon is responsible for the housing crisis, so this is the least they can do” narrative.

But is it the least they can do? Over the past 25 years we’ve found a sweet spot assuming the worst about tech participants, be they the ashram-visiting, hoody-sporting eccentrics at the top or the lowly coders toiling away beneath them, because it was easy. We just slotted them in to receive the disdain we’d aimed at lawyers, bankers and politicians in the past.

But consider this: the $2 billion Amazon has pledged — and the $1 billion Facebook and Google each pledged to affordable housing in 2019, along with Apple’s $2.5 billion and the $500 million pledged two years ago by the once-reviled but now OG of tech largesse, Bill Gates of Microsoft — shows up pretty well when you compare it to the $500 million Bay Area Housing Fund, also launched two years ago, that required participation from four separate foundations and at least a half-dozen companies, including Ford, Hewlett-Packard, Genentech and Morgan Stanley.

I’m not here to convince you that Jeff Bezos is a trim, gleaming-domed Santa Claus, or that Sergei Brin and Mark Zuckerberg should be canonized. We all understand that you don’t get to be a billionaire by keeping your foot off of the gas. But maybe, when these would-be Emperor Palpatines do something like this, some act of good that is huge and in fact unprecedented, rather than sticking to the script and saying it’s not enough, or assuming, Bernie Sanders-style, that it’s all a cynical PR stunt, we should instead recognize good when it happens, even — and maybe especially — if it comes from someone we’ve already written off as bad.

Larry Rosen is a San Francisco-based writer, editor, podcaster and recovering former Realtor. He is a guest columnist and his viewpoint is not necessarily that of the Examiner. The Market Musings real estate column appears every other week.

affordable housingAmazon

Just Posted

Pharmacist Hank Chen is known for providing personalized service at Charlie’s Pharmacy in the Fillmore.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Left: A Walgreens at 300 Gough St. is among San Francisco stores closing.
Walgreens closures open the door for San Francisco’s neighborhood pharmacies

‘I think you’ll see more independents start to pop up’

San Franciscans are likely to have the opportunity to vote in four different elections in 2022. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Electionpalooza: SF school board recall will kick off a flurry of local races

‘It’s going to be a lot of elections and a lot of decisions for voters to make’

Four young politicos were elected to city government on the Peninsula in 2020. From left: Redwood City Councilmember Michael Smith; South San Francisco Councilmember James Coleman; Redwood City Councilmember Lissette Espinoza-Garnica; and East Palo Alto Councilmember Antonio Lopez.<ins> (Examiner illustration/Courtesy photos)</ins>
Progressive politicians rise to power on the Peninsula. Will redistricting reverse the trend?

‘There’s this wave of young people really trying to shake things up’

The fate of San Francisco nicotine giant Juul remains to be seen, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is reviewing whether to allow certain flavored vape products on the market. <ins>(Jeenah Moon/New York Times)</ins>
How the vape king of teen nicotine addiction rose and fell in San Francisco

‘Hey, Juul, don’t let the door hit you on the way out’

Most Read