What a health insurer wants

The Left is getting all excited about indications that the health insurance industry is favoring Republicans. This time, the liberals are only being partly misleading.

Let’s start with Ezra Klein who blogs:

You know, I keep hearing what a gift the health-care law is to the insurance industry, and then I read that they’re donating tens of millions of dollars to groups trying to elect candidates pledging to repeal the legislation, and then millions and millions more to individual Republican legislators who’ve pledged to repeal the law. It’s all very confusing. [Emphasis added].

But read that second link Klein provided. The first policy matter discussed:

The healthcare law will penalize Americans $95 in 2014 if they fail to get insurance. The penalty rises to $695 in 2016.

“The one thing that insurance companies would love to see are penalties that are actually stronger,” said Jeff Fusile, a partner at consulting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers.

So, that’s not “repealing” Obamacare — it’s actually multiplying one aspect of it. Rather than Klein’s simplistic explanation (insurers want repeal), there’s something more subtle going on. It’s the typical industry one-two punch: get Democrats to put in place subsidies, mandates, and protective regulations, and get Republicans to take out taxes and hurtful regulations.

But what does this mean for conservatives? It means this: don’t trust any Republican who says he’s going to “repeal” Obamacare. If they were serious about this, the health insurers would still be backing Democrats.

The Politico writes about the health industry is now favoring Republicans, for a change. The funny thing about that: Politico and its ilk never covered — during the health-care debate — how the industry’s money was strongly favoring Dems. Like the Washington Post with Wall Street money, they run the “industry is moving right” piece without having ever published the “industry is far left” piece.

Beltway ConfidentialNEPUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

U.S. Attorney David Anderson announces federal firearms charges against two men for their roles in a March 2019 shooting outside the Fillmore Heritage Center in a news conference alongside SFPD staff at the Phillip Burton Federal Building on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Departing U.S. attorney predicts corruption probe will continue

David Anderson shook up City Hall as top federal prosecutor

Board of Supervisors President Shamann Walton, a former school board member, has been asked to help secure an agreement between the school district and teacher’s union. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
 <ins></ins>
Supervisor Walton tapped to mediate teacher contract talks

District and union at odds over hours in-person students should be in the classroom

California is set to receive supplies of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which is still under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Courtesy photo)
California could receive 380K doses of new J&J COVID vaccine next week

California could receive 380,300 doses of the new Johnson & Johnson vaccine… Continue reading

Disability advocates protested outside the home of San Francisco Health Officer Tomas Aragon. (Courtesy Brooke Anderson)
Vaccine rollout plan for people with disabilities remains deeply flawed

On February 13, disability activists paid a visit to the house of… Continue reading

A Bay Area Concrete Recycling facility that opened on PG&E property in 2019. Former PG&E employees have been accused of accepting bribes from Bay Area Concrete. (Courtesy of Bay Area Concrete Recycling via ProPublica)
Lawsuit reveals new allegations against PG&E contractor accused of fraud

By Scott Morris Bay City News Foundation Utility giant Pacific Gas &… Continue reading

Most Read