UK judge: Social network sites differ from press

Should gossip swapped on social networking sites be subject to the same kind of scrutiny as material published in a newspaper? It's a question that has bedeviled Internet users and officials across the world, and it's one the judge at the center of the inquiry into British media ethics has been struggling with.

At a Thursday hearing which heard testimony from executives at Google and Facebook, Lord Justice Brian Leveson seemed to come down on the “there-is-a-difference” side of the argument.

“There's a distinction between Facebook, where one person is communicating with their friends … or Twitter, and organizations that are in the business of selling themselves by reference to news or information,” he said at the end of the session.

“That's the difference between the pub chatter … and that which … all of us has an interest in seeing is conducted on a level playing field.”

Leveson's comments were offhand, and the judge has repeatedly warned journalists against reading too much into his remarks. But Leveson has the potential to recommend wide-ranging changes to Britain's media industry and even throwaway comments are being parsed closely by journalists.

The inquiry was set up in the wake of Britain's phone hacking scandal and could recommend that the country's press watchdog, which proved embarrassingly incapable of tackling the issue, be reinforced, reformed or replaced.

The inquiry has also considered extending journalistic oversight more aggressively across the Internet, with Leveson saying earlier Thursday that “the rules have to cover everybody.”

But one of Leveson's witnesses, blogger Camilla Wright, suggested the judge might find it hard to propose regulating bloggers who could just decide to jump to servers in the U.S. if British rules proved too onerous.

In any case, Wright said, it was difficult to decide who was a journalist in the Internet age.

“Technology is constantly evolving. Who considers themselves a journalist, who considers themselves a broadcaster, who considers themselves a blogger, the world is changing as these platforms change. How you deal with that, I guess, is yet another challenge.”



medianewsNews mediaUS

Just Posted

Pharmacist Hank Chen is known for providing personalized service at Charlie’s Pharmacy in the Fillmore.<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Left: A Walgreens at 300 Gough St. is among San Francisco stores closing.
Walgreens closures open the door for San Francisco’s neighborhood pharmacies

‘I think you’ll see more independents start to pop up’

San Franciscans are likely to have the opportunity to vote in four different elections in 2022. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Electionpalooza: SF school board recall will kick off a flurry of local races

‘It’s going to be a lot of elections and a lot of decisions for voters to make’

Four young politicos were elected to city government on the Peninsula in 2020. From left: Redwood City Councilmember Michael Smith; South San Francisco Councilmember James Coleman; Redwood City Councilmember Lissette Espinoza-Garnica; and East Palo Alto Councilmember Antonio Lopez.<ins> (Examiner illustration/Courtesy photos)</ins>
Progressive politicians rise to power on the Peninsula. Will redistricting reverse the trend?

‘There’s this wave of young people really trying to shake things up’

The fate of San Francisco nicotine giant Juul remains to be seen, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is reviewing whether to allow certain flavored vape products on the market. <ins>(Jeenah Moon/New York Times)</ins>
How the vape king of teen nicotine addiction rose and fell in San Francisco

‘Hey, Juul, don’t let the door hit you on the way out’

Most Read