The pros and cons of the Pledge for America

National Review’s Ramesh Ponnuru — one of the right’s best policy minds — has a great run down of what he likes  about the GOP’s Pledge for America over at the Washington Post. A sampling of what he likes:

1) It promises to cut discretionary spending. The objection that Republicans should have itemized all the programs they would cut strikes me as wrongheaded. You set an overall budget target before allocating the funding.

And what he doesn’t like:

1) It promises federal legislation to reform medical malpractice. Why shouldn’t states set their own policies?

There’s a lot more at the link. Be sure and read it all.

The downturn persists

Examiner analysis reveals that San Francisco’s economy has a long road to recovery

It’s the Year of the S.F. Recall — but who pays and who benefits politically?

Recalls may become more frequent and contribute to political destabilization

Local startup raises billions of dollars to reverse the aging process

Fountain of Youth firm will start with mice, is Jeff Bezos next?