The pros and cons of the Pledge for America

National Review’s Ramesh Ponnuru — one of the right’s best policy minds — has a great run down of what he likes  about the GOP’s Pledge for America over at the Washington Post. A sampling of what he likes:

1) It promises to cut discretionary spending. The objection that Republicans should have itemized all the programs they would cut strikes me as wrongheaded. You set an overall budget target before allocating the funding.

And what he doesn’t like:

1) It promises federal legislation to reform medical malpractice. Why shouldn’t states set their own policies?

There’s a lot more at the link. Be sure and read it all.

Beltway ConfidentialNEPPledge for AmericaUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Breed declares local emergency to counter threat of coronavirus

City officials warn against discrimination while they prepare for the possibility of an outbreak.

Educators warn of possible strike after district calls for budget cuts, layoffs

SFUSD faces up to $31.8 million shortfall in current school year

Tumlin apologizes after Muni subway suffers five breakdowns in three hours

Agency working on fixes for aging train control system and cars

SF approves facility for homeless youth in Lower Nob Hill

Approval of navigation center latest expansion in city portfolio of shelter beds

Man suing SFPD alleging officers beat him with batons

Cop attorney fires back: police were ‘interrupting a dangerous domestic violence incident’

Most Read