Supreme Court may limit partisan gerrymanders

 

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court heard a strong argument Tuesday for reining in partisan gerrymandering — at least if it’s extreme enough to allow one party’s politicians to keep themselves in power for a decade.

Better yet for the groups challenging gerrymanders, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who likely holds the swing vote on the issue, seemed open to ruling that extreme gerrymanders are unconstitutional.

“Politicians are never going to fix gerrymandering. You are the only institution in the United States that can solve this problem,” Paul Smith, an attorney for Wisconsin Democrats, who brought the current case, told the justices.

Kennedy asked a lawyer for Wisconsin’s Republicans whether it would be constitutional for the state to adopt a law that the election map will be drawn to “favor party X over party Y.”

Attorney Erin Murphy hesitated, noting that in this case, Republicans did not publicly proclaim that they were drawing a statewide map to ensure the GOP would maintain a solid majority, even though that was the effect of the district lines they created.

Kennedy was undeterred. “I’d like an answer to my question,” he said.

By the time the hourlong argument ended, it was clear that Kennedy believes the Constitution would prevent one party from writing a law designed to keep itself in power for a decade. What was unclear is whether he was convinced that the Republicans in Wisconsin had in effect done that when they went behind closed doors and drew legislative boundaries after the last Census.

The district lines the Republican-controlled legislature adopted ensured the GOP would have a 60-vote supermajority in the state’s Assembly, the lower house of its Legislature, even if a majority of voters statewide voted for Democrats, as they did in subsequent elections.

By contrast to Kennedy, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. made clear he was opposed to the court taking on the issue of partisan gerrymandering based on what he called “sociological gobbledygook.” He was referring to statistical studies that characterize the Wisconsin electoral map as highly unusual.

If the court declares the Wisconsin map unconstitutional, the justices in years to come will have to decide on a series of highly political disputes, he said.

The case heard Tuesday, Gill v. Whitford, is a once-in-a-decade challenge to partisan gerrymandering, a process that since 2010 has allowed Republicans to control power in at least half a dozen states where the voters are closely divided.

Wisconsin provides a textbook example. The GOP redistricting plan succeeded in preserving Republican control of the legislature despite their losing a majority of voters statewide. Federal judges ruled that the Wisconsin Republicans had gone too far and had unfairly “entrenched” themselves in power.

The high court, however, has never before struck down a state’s election districts simply because they were unfairly partisan.

If Kennedy and four other justices say Wisconsin went too far, the outcome could reach far beyond that state to potentially reshape the U.S. House of Representatives.

The justices will hand down a decision in the case later in the court’s term.

US

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

The sidewalk on Egbert Avenue in the Bayview recently was cluttered with car parts, tires and other junk. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
New surveillance effort aims to crack down on illegal dumping

’We want to make sure we catch people who are trashing our streets’

The recall election for California Gov. Gavin Newsom is scheduled for Sept. 14. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
SF could play a big role in overcoming Democrat apathy, driving voter turnout for Newsom

San Francisco voters are not used to swaying elections. Just think of… Continue reading

Health care workers treat a Covid-19 patient who needs to be intubated before being put on a ventilator at Providence St. Mary Medical Center during a surge of cases in Apple Valley, Dec. 17, 2020. Confronted with surging infections, California became the first state in the country to mandate coronavirus vaccines or testing for state employees and health-care workers. (Ariana Drehsler/The New York Times)
In California, a mix of support and resistance to new vaccine rules

By Shawn Hubler, Livia Albeck-Ripka and Soumya Karlamangla New York Times SACRAMENTO… Continue reading

Dave Hodges, pastor at Zide Door, the Church of Entheogenic Plants that include marijuana and psilocybin mushrooms, holds some psychedelic mushrooms inside the Oakland church on Friday, July 22, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Psychedelic spirituality: Inside a growing Bay Area religious movement

‘They are guiding us into something ineffable’

Most Read