Should lobbyists receive a label?

Lobbyists looking to influence City Hall decision-making could wind up sticking out in the crowd under a proposal by one city legislator that would require special-interest representatives to wear identification badges when making contact with elected and city officials — even at events outside the building.

Supervisor Chris Daly, who introduced the legislation, told The Examiner on Friday that it would add “transparency” to government and called it “very San Francisco.”

The badge would serve as a reminder to “decision-makers” that the lobbyist is representing a client “who has interests,” he said.

Reported money spent on lobbying efforts is on the rise in San Francisco. In 1996, $2.7 million was spent on lobbying efforts by those required to report spending; last year, $7.1 million was spent on lobbying efforts, according to reports by The City’s Ethics Commission.

Among clients lobbyists are representing are labor unions, developers with projects proposed for the Port and those before the Planning Commission, companies with contracts before the Board of Supervisors, hospitals and billboard companies, according to lobbyist filings with The City.

“I don’t have a problem with [the proposal]. I don’t have a problem with what I do. It might be a great marketing tool,” said registered lobbyist Sam Lauter with Barnes Mosher Whitehurst Lauter & Partners, which represents the Academy of Art University.

Supervisor Sean Elsbernd was skeptical about the proposal.

“Does giving them a Scarlet L truly achieve something? I’m not sure,” Elsbernd said.

Only those who earn $3,200 in any consecutive three months for lobbying services or who has at least 25 separate contacts with city officials during any two months must register and report spending with the Ethics Commission, under the city’s lobbyist ordinance.

In April, when the Ethics Commission is expected to discuss Daly’s legislation, it will also consider lowering the threshold for having to report lobbying activity, said John St. Croix, the commission’s executive director. The proposed changes are in response to concerns that there are paid workers representing special interests who are not registering as lobbyists because they don’t technically meet the current criteria for the label.

“The citizens have a right to know who is being paid to influence governmental decisions,” St. Croix said.

Political analysts questioned the intent of the badge-proposal and said it raises legal issues.

“You can’t make people have to dress a certain way or look a certain way to address their views,” political analyst David Latterman said. Corey Cook, political science professor at University of San Francisco, said that lobbyists are often looked upon unfavorably, but that they are “integral” to the government process.

“For somebody who thinks lobbyists aren’t all evil, that seems a little bit over the top,” he said of Daly’s legislation.

jsabatini@examiner.com  

Just Posted

Central Subway project projected to run $55 million over budget

San Francisco’s $1.6 billion Central Subway is roughly $55 million in the… Continue reading

HUD secretary calls for increased deregulation after tour of Potrero Hill public housing

Carson calls for greater ‘cooperation’ between local, federal officials but offers no additional funds

Suspect in high-profile waterfront attack ordered to stand trial

Judge adds charge against Austin James Vincent for alleged criminal threats

SF increases public funding to help those running for mayor, supervisor

Those running for the Board of Supervisors or mayor will have access… Continue reading

SF supervisors call on health department to ‘pause’ planned relocation of mental health patients

Tensions high as protest by over closure of long-term beds shuts down Health Commission meeting

Most Read