Pro-choice group reacts to Obama claims on health care and abortion

Seeking to quell dissatisfaction with the inclusion of the Stupak amendment in the health care bill among pro-choice Democrats in the House, President Obama told Jake Tapper of ABC News (link):

“I laid out a very simple principle, which is this is a health care bill, not an abortion bill,” Obama said. “And we're not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions.

He went on to insist that the bill must not change the status quo regarding abortion that no federal dollars will go towards abortion.

This is a direct contradiction of much of the liberal ethos. For pro-choice activists, abortion is a necessary part of health care. In a statement to the Examiner, Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America said:

The Stupak-Pitts amendment, as passed by the House, represents an abortion ban that goes far beyond the status quo. We're working with all of our allies, including those in the White House, to make sure the Senate bill does not include the same divisive abortion ban that's in the House bill.

But those allies at one point included President Obama, who has applauded the bill, and currently insists it will not go beyond the status quo. According to NARAL's own statement makes it clear this is quite a departure:

The Stupak-Pitts amendment makes it virtually impossible for private insurance companies that participate in the new system to offer abortion coverage to women. This would have the effect of denying women the right to use their own personal private funds to purchase an insurance plan with abortion coverage in the new health system — a radical departure from the status quo. Presently, more than 85 percent of private-insurance plans cover abortion services.

Looks like “change” is about to hit that status quo straight on.

Beltway ConfidentialUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco leaders argue that plans to develop housing in the region’s transit-heavy urban areas are at odds with goals to increase equity for people of color.
SF officials fear regional housing strategy could increase displacement of people of color

Equity and climate goals at odds in plan that concentrates development in transit-rich urban areas

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Authority cut most of its bus service last year due to the pandemic, and has been slow to bring it back due to budget concerns and low ridership. (Samantha Laurey/ Special to S.F. Examiner)
Supes urge SFMTA to expedite restoration of Muni lines

Resolution emphasizes focus on seniors, individuals with disabilities and community routes

San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott listens at a rally to commemorate the life of George Floyd and others killed by police outside City Hall on Monday, June 1, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Will the Biden Administration help SF speed up police reform?

City has struggled to implement changes without federal oversight

Assemblymember David Chiu introduced a bill that would assist formerly incarcerated who are at risk of homelessness. <ins>(Ellie Doyen/Special to S.F. Examiner)</ins>
David Chiu: Closing 5 California prisons would free up money to house former inmates

By Hannah Wiley The Sacramento Bee A California Democrat wants to keep… Continue reading

Lowell High School (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Students, families call for culture shift at Lowell after racist incident

District to explore changes including possible revision of admissions policy

Most Read