Post transmits–and undermines–Holder's attempt to cover himself on CIA prosecutions

 

In a front page story three Washington Post reporters write that Attorney General Eric Holder’s investigation of detainee abuse by CIA personnel will focus on “a very small number of cases.” The article doesn’t exactly bury the really startling news, announced on Friday and therefore not previously covered in the print Post, that seven former CIA directors wrote a letter urging President Barack Obama to call off Holder’s investigation. That’s mentioned, briefly, in the second and third paragraphs. And the article mentions as well that the seven directors served under presidents of both parties, but it denies the reader the information that the seven include all living former CIA directors except the nonagenarian Stansfield Turner and former President George H. W. Bush. Turner may be in no position to sign such a letter, while Bush, like living former presidents of both parties except for Jimmy Carter, can be presumed to be adhering to a policy of not criticizing the current incumbent.
 
I suppose you could argue that the Post is advancing the story by reporting that Holder’s investigation is very narrow. But I take this as a leak from Holder attempting to discount the former CIA directors’ letters and to prevent Obama from directing him (as legally he certainly could) to stop the investigation. Of course that puts Holder at risk of antagonizing the left-wing Madame Defarges of our time who want to see prosecutions of career government employees who were doing their duty to protect the nation in line with the orders they received from their superiors and within the legal guidelines set down by competent legal authorities at the time.
 
The article does mention that career federal prosecutors reviewed these cases five years ago and decided not to prosecute (except in one case in which a conviction was obtained). And it does present some information which casts doubt on Holder’s decision. To wit: “Before his decision to reopen the cases, Holder did not read detailed memos that prosecutors drafted and placed in their files to explain their decision to decline prosecutions.” In other words, he didn’t do due diligence before making a decision that seven former CIA directors say will be harmful to national security. So even this CYA attempt by Holder to rebuff the former CIA directors is undermined by material that the Post reporters, to their credit, present to their readers.

 

Beltway ConfidentialUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Anti-police protester sues over arrest at 2019 Pride Parade

A protester whose arrest at San Francisco’s 2019 Pride Parade intensified pressure… Continue reading

Veritas offers to forgive unpaid rent, but tenants are wary

Calls for rent forgiveness have been answered, but with some caveats. The… Continue reading

Dozens gather for candlelight vigil to honor victims in Beirut explosion

Dozens of people gathered at Rincon Park on Thursday evening to show… Continue reading

School district, teachers reach tentative agreement on distance learning

With less than two weeks until the start of the school year,… Continue reading

Boudin, Gascon defend NFL in controversy over Stephon Clark video

Public service announcement prompted pushback from California prosecutors association

Most Read