Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, left, and National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael Rogers, right, testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee about cyber threats to the United States and fielded questions about effects of Russian government hacking on the 2016 presidential election on Capitol Hill Jan. 5, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, left, and National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael Rogers, right, testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee about cyber threats to the United States and fielded questions about effects of Russian government hacking on the 2016 presidential election on Capitol Hill Jan. 5, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS)

‘Only Russia’s senior-most officials’ could have authorized campaign data thefts, US intelligence officials testify

WASHINGTON — Three U.S. spy chiefs testified publicly for the first time Thursday that the Kremlin’s most senior leaders approved a Russian intelligence operation aimed at interfering in the U.S. presidential race, a conclusion that President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly challenged.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was joined by Adm. Michael Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Marcel J. Lettre, undersecretary of Defense for intelligence, to answer questions at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Russian theft and leaks of thousands of emails before the November election.

“We assess that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized the recent election-focused data thefts and disclosures, based on the scope and sensitivity of the targets,” they wrote in joint remarks submitted for the hearing.

Russian cyberattacks pose “a major threat” to the U.S. government, the military and financial institutions, as well as the nation’s electrical and communications infrastructure, the intelligence officials said.

“Russia is a full-scope cyber actor that poses a major threat to U.S. government, military, diplomatic, commercial and critical infrastructure and key resource networks because of its highly advanced offensive cyber program and sophisticated tactics, techniques, and procedures,” the officials said.

“For example, Russian actors have seeded falsified information into social media and news feeds and websites in order to sow doubt and confusion, erode faith in democratic institutions and attempt to weaken Western governments by portraying them as inherently corrupt and dysfunctional,” the officials said.

The committee chairman, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), and many others in Congress have expressed alarm at Trump’s repeated rejection of intelligence judgments that say senior officials at the Kremlin, including Russian President Vladimir Putin, orchestrated cyberattacks intended to discredit U.S. democracy and help elect Trump.

Russia’s theft and disclosure of emails during the 2016 elections was “an unprecedented attack on our democracy,” McCain said at the start of the hearing, which was broadcast live on cable news networks.

The U.S. has not responded harshly enough to cyberattacks from Russia, China, North Korea and other countries, McCain said.

“Our adversaries have made the calculation that the reward for attacking America in cyberspace outweighs the risk,” McCain said.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark), a member of the committee, came to Trump’s defense.

Some of Trump’s campaign promises would hurt Russia’s energy-dependent economy and threaten Moscow’s strategic interests, Cotton said, including increasing U.S. production of oil and gas, and boosting U.S. military spending.

“There is some contrary evidence, despite what the media speculates, that perhaps Donald Trump is not the best candidate for Russia,” Cotton said.

Clapper agreed that expanding the U.S. military would hurt Russia’s standing in the world.

“Anything we do to enhance our military capability, absolutely,” would be detrimental to Russian interests, Clapper said.

U.S. intelligence officials have seen the Kremlin launch more and more aggressive cyber operations in recent years, including hacks designed to mask individuals using false online identities.

The hearing, the first on the hacking since the November election, comes a day before Trump is to get a top-level briefing on the issue from Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan and National Security Director Adm. Mike Rogers at Trump’s office in New York.

The intelligence officials also will brief Trump on the broader review that President Barack Obama recently requested on Russian and Chinese hacks during the 2008, 2012 and 2016 U.S. elections and what was learned from those intrusions.

The classified report is finished. Obama ordered it completed before he leaves office on Jan. 20 to ensure a full record is available, aides have said.

Senior intelligence officials are grappling with how much of the report to make public without exposing sensitive surveillance systems and intelligence assets. They already have blamed two Russian spy services, the GRU and the FSB, for organizing the theft and release of sensitive emails last summer and fall, but haven’t said precisely how they know.

U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded that the Russian cyber operation sought to damage Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and to help Trump’s bid for the White House.

Clapper did not confirm that judgment Thursday, although he indicated it would be included in the classified report.

“Yes, we will ascribe a motivation,” he said. “I’d rather not preempt the report.”

The full House and the full Senate will be briefed on a classified version of the review next week, Clapper said. After those briefings, a declassified version will be made public, he said.

Trump has criticized the Obama administration for not releasing the raw intelligence that supports its conclusion that Russian officials wanted to influence the U.S. election. Clapper said he will push for additional details to be included in the version of the review that is made public.

“I intend to push the envelope as much as we can in the unclassified version because I think the public should know as much about this as possible,” Clapper said. “There are some fragile sources and methods.”

Clapper said the intelligence community stood “actually more resolutely” on its Oct. 7 statement that first blamed Russia for conducting cyberattacks during the presidential campaign.

“We have no way of gauging the impact … it had on the choice the electorate made,” Clapper said. “Whether or not it was an act of war is a very heavy policy call. I don’t think the intelligence community should weigh in on that; I do think it should carry great gravity.”

The Russian operations to influence the U.S. elections didn’t involve changing vote tallies, Clapper said.

“It was a multifaceted campaign,” Clapper said. “The hacking was only one part of it. It also entailed classical propaganda, misinformation, fake news” that continues today, he added.

2016 electionDonald TrumphackingRussia

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

An empty space where a Shared Spaces parklet once stood outside Aquitaine Wine Bistro on Church Street on Wednesday, June 23, 2021. The parklet was recently destroyed in a car crash. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
Cars and parklets don’t mix: SF searches for solutions in wake of accidents

Andrew Fidelman got the call in the middle of the night from… Continue reading

Supervisor Dean Preston speaks about rent relief at a meeting of Faith in Action, a nonprofit serving low-income residents. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
How to apply for post-pandemic rent relief in San Francisco and California

Reyna Aguilar has amassed $20,000 in rent debt since losing her restaurant… Continue reading

Transit-only lanes on Mission Street have reduced travel times by 20 percent during the pandemic, transit officials say. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
Pandemic experiments morph into long-term solutions for SF transit agency

The streets of San Francisco became real-time laboratories for The City’s public… Continue reading

NO CONNECTION TO SERVER:
Unable to connect to GPS server ‘blackpress.newsengin.com’
Debate reignites over San Francisco’s first public bank

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, momentum was building for San Francisco to… Continue reading

Owners of Levi’s Plaza on The Embarcadero say gas boilers on the property will be replaced by electric and solar sources in the next few years. (Shutterstock)
Big plans for clean power at Levi’s Plaza

Transition to net zero carbon in step with S.F.’s environmental goals

Most Read