Obamanomics: General Electric wins big with White House

Days after Obama’s inauguration, Jeff Immelt, CEO of General Electric, wrote to shareholders: “We are going through more than a cycle. The global economy, and capitalism, will be ‘reset’ in several important ways.
 
“The interaction between government and business will change forever. In a reset economy, the government will be a regulator; and also an industry policy champion, a financier, and a key partner.”

General Electric is a sprawling, complex corporation with many diverse businesses. The company makes light bulbs and refrigerators, sure, but it also has a finance arm, a transportation arm, a health care arm, a communications arm and others. The above letter from Immelt reveals what these arms all have in common: They reach out for government favors.

Look at any major policy initiative from President Barack Obama — health care reform, climate change regulation, embryonic stem cell research, infrastructure stimulus, electrical transmission smart-grids — and you’ll find GE has set up shop, angling for a way to pocket government handouts, gain business through mandates or profit from government regulation.

In April, Obama appeared with train enthusiast and Vice President Joe Biden and also Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood alongside a map depicting a network of high-speed passenger rail lines crossing the nation. “What we’re talking about is a vision for high-speed rail in America,” Obama said.

He added: “Imagine boarding a train in the center of a city. Imagine whisking through towns at speeds over 100 miles an hour, walking only a few steps to public transportation, and ending up just blocks from your destination. Imagine what a great project that would be to rebuild America.”

After the hope came the call for change: “There’s no reason why we can’t do this. This is America.

“There’s no reason why the future of travel should lie somewhere else beyond our borders. Building a new system of high-speed rail in America will be faster, cheaper and easier than building more freeways or adding to an already overburdened aviation system — and everybody stands to benefit.”

He was talking about $13 million in federal spending on this rail vision. So it was clear someone would benefit.

One month later, we got a hint of who it would be: “GE has the know-how and the manufacturing base to develop the next generation of high-speed passenger locomotives,” said Lorenzo Simonelli, CEO of GE Transportation. “We are ready to partner with the federal government and Amtrak to make high-speed rail a reality.”

GE was rolling out its next-generation locomotive “before a crowd of employees and public officials,” the Erie Times-News reported. One month later, GE Transportation hired Linda Daschle, wife of Obama confidant Tom Daschle, to lobby on train issues.

This was typical: an Obama policy pronouncement in close conjunction with a GE business initiative. It happens across all sectors of the economy and in all corners of GE’s sprawling enterprise.

Here’s another example: On March 9, Obama issued an executive order extending federal funding, through the National Institutes for Health, for research on stem cells derived from human embryos.

Where President George W. Bush had opened federal funding only for stem cells that had already been harvested from embryos (and those stem cells can be used to create new stem cells), Obama was allowing scientists who harvest stem cells from healthy embryos (thus killing the embryos) to get NIH funding for the research on those new stem cells.

Obama’s executive order went into effect July 7. A week earlier, GE had announced that GE Healthcare and embryonic stem cell giant Geron “have entered into a global exclusive license and alliance agreement to develop and commercialize cellular assay products derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) for use in drug discovery, development and toxicity screening.”

Geron described itself as having “core expertise in telomerase and human embryonic stem cells.”

Obama sent money to an industry, and GE hustled to make sure the company was there waiting.

The GE-Obama “partnership” may even extend to the realm of foreign policy. In September, Obama acceded to a long-term Russian demand to cancel U.S. plans to place missile defense installations in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Many Republicans and hawkish commentators assailed Obama for showing weakness. Not everyone was disappointed, however.

Reuters reported: “Investors could see some long-term trade and other benefits if a U.S. move to back away from a missile shield in Eastern Europe yields improvements in relations with Russia.” Then Reuters reported a telling detail: “Shortly after the pullback on the shield program was announced, Russia’s government said Prime Minister Vladimir Putin would meet several U.S. executives on Friday from firms including General Electric.”

Obama acts, GE profits.

Timothy P. Carney is The Washington Examiner’s lobbying editor.

Op EdsUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Diners at Teeth, a bar in the Mission District, on July 9, 2021. Teeth began using digital menus based on QR code technology in August. (Ulysses Ortega/The New York Times)
The football stadium at UC Berkeley, on Saturday, Sept. 26, 2020. George Kliavkoff, a former top executive at MGM Resorts International, took over the conference at the start of the month. (Jim Wilson/The New York Times)
What’s Ahead for the Pac-12? New commissioner weighs in

‘Every decision we make is up for discussion. There are no sacred cows.’

The sidewalk on Egbert Avenue in the Bayview recently was cluttered with car parts, tires and other junk. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)</ins>
New surveillance effort aims to crack down on illegal dumping

’We want to make sure we catch people who are trashing our streets’

One of the 13 murals that make up “The Life of Washington,” at George Washington High School in San Francisco, April 9, 2019. Liberals are battling liberals over these Depression-era frescoes that have offended some groups. (Jim Wilson/The New York Times)
The story behind the mural controversy at San Francisco’s Washington High School

By Carol Pogash New York Times A California court this week ruled… Continue reading

Most Read