Obama campaign continues dealing falsehoods on lobbyists and special interests

President Obama, the White House, and the Democratic National Committee bombard us with so much false and misleading pablum about special interests and lobbyists that it’s hard to see it as anything other than a dishonest smear campaign.

The latest installment of Obama’s fake war against the special interests is an email today from Organizing for America, the heir of the Obama campaign and an arm of the DNC.

Some highlights, with my responses:

The special interests in Washington are not happy, and it’s because of something you did.

<p>Since President Obama moved into the White House, this movement has stripped them of their influence, proving we could take on the lobbyists and corporate cash with good, old-fashioned organizing.

At the risk of patting myself on the back too much, but if the special interests in Washington are unhappy with me, it’s probably for pointing out how:

  • The single-largest industry group in the country, the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America, helped write ObamaCare and profits from it.
  • The company that spends the most on lobbying, General Electric, lobbies for and profits from plenty of Obama’s top policy priorities, such as cap-and-trade, renewable energy subsidies, high-speed rail subsidies, battery subsidies, smart meters, and embryonic stem-cell subsidies.
  • Labor union PACs have spent more this year than every PAC in these industries, combined:
    oil and gas, mining, Wall Street, commercial banks, defense contractors, HMOs, telecom, and lobbyists.

So, it doesn’t sound like Obama stripped the special interests of their power.

And “corporate cash”? Did I mention that Democrats have gotten more in aggregate from all of those industries’ PACs than Republicans have?

The email is obviously riffing off of the recent New York Times piece on Boehner, so go check out my other recent posts about that article’s flaws:

Barack ObamaBeltway ConfidentialJohn BoehnerUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

BART Ambassadors are being called on to assist riders in social situations that don’t require police force. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Unarmed BART ambassadors program formalized with a focus on community service

Public safety and police reform are key elements in campaigns of Board members Dufty and Simon

On Oct. 13, people lined up to vote early for the presidential election in Southlake, Texas. <ins>(Shutterstock)</ins>
<ins></ins>
Five things to watch for in the run-up to Nov. 3

Down-ballot races, as much as the presidency, will determine the future course of this nation

WeChat (Shutterstock)
U.S. District Court denies Trump request to shutdown WeChat app

A federal judge in San Francisco denied a request by the U.S.… Continue reading

School board members Gabriela Lopez (left) and Alison Collins (right) say they have been the subject of frequent hateful, racist and sexist attacks during their time on the school board. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F Examiner)
Angered by Lowell decision, SFUSD grad targets school board members with violent imagery

Facebook page depicts two women of color on board with swastikas and x-marks on their faces

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer, a former school board member, said it was ‘ridiculous’ that the school district did not yet have a plan to reopen. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Supervisors demand SFUSD set a timeline for reopening

Pressure grows on district to resume in-person learning as The City’s COVID-19 case count goes down

Most Read