Judicial Watch taking Justice Department to court on New Black Panther FOIA

Judicial Watch, the non-profit legal watchdog organization, has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice in an effort to force the government to make public documents showing involvement by President Obama’s political appointees in the decision to drop prosecution of the New Black Panthers case.

The suit is in response to DOJ’s failure to respond credibly to a Jan. 19, 2010, FOIA by Judicial Watch for all “records of Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli concerning meetings with the White House on the Justice Department’s voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party.”

The government did not respond to the Judicial Watch FOIA until March 26, and then said it had found no documents responsive to the request.

But then Judicial Watch received in a separate FOIA proceeding a document that described at least eight emails exchanged between Obama political appointees and career attorneys concerning resolution of the controversial case. Those emails are among 122 documents DOJ is refusing to turn over to Judicial Watch.

“Why should anyone believe the Justice Department’s story regarding these records? We now know Justice officials falsely stated that no political appointees were involved in the Black Panther decision. The Justice Department continues to withhold hundreds of pages of records that could shed light on this scandal,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton.

“And despite multiple press reports documenting Perrelli’s White House meetings, the Justice Department cannot find a single record related to these meetings. We’re tired of getting the run-around and that’s why we sued,” Fitton said.

The case stems from an incident that occurred Nov. 4, 2008, outside a Philadelphia polling station in which two members of the New Black Panther, one of whom displayed a police-style baton, harrassed white voters and hurled racial epithets. A video of part of the incident was posted on the Internet.

Despite having strong cases against both men, the Obama Justice Department opted for a plea agreement with minimal punishment, including an agreement not to carry weapons near Philadelphia voting places prior to the 2012 elections.

For more on this case and its background, go here.

Beltway ConfidentialUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Recology executives have acknowledged overcharging city ratepayers. (Mira Laing/2017 Special to S.F. Examiner)
Recology to repay customers $95M in overcharged garbage fees, city attorney says

San Francisco’s waste management company, Recology, has agreed to repay its customers… Continue reading

A construction worker watches a load for a crane operator at the site of the future Chinatown Muni station for the Central Subway on Tuesday, March 3, 2021. (Sebastian Miño-Bucheli / Special to the S.F. Examiner)
Major construction on Central Subway to end by March 31

SFMTA board approves renegotiated contract with new deadline, more contractor payments

(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Settlement clears path for all youth, high school sports to resume in California

John Maffei The San Diego Union-Tribune All youth and high school sports… Continue reading

State to reserve 40 percent of COVID-19 vaccines for hard-hit areas

By Eli Walsh Bay City News Foundation State officials said Thursday that… Continue reading

Neighbors and environmental advocates have found the Ferris wheel in Golden Gate Park noisy and inappropriate for its natural setting. <ins>(</ins>
Golden Gate Park wheel wins extension, but for how long?

Supervisors move to limit contract under City Charter provision requiring two-thirds approval

Most Read