Judicial Watch sues Secret Service for White House visitor logs

That pesky Judicial Wach bunch just won't go away! Now they've filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Secret Service, asking a federal court to order the release of visitor logs to the White House for the period between Jan.  20, 2009, and Aug. 10, 2009.

The suit was filed after the Secret Service denied Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requiest for the logs. According to Judicial Watch, the Secret Service denial is based on the incorrect argument that White House visitor logs are not subject to the FOIA because the logs aren't “agency records.”

In fact, federal courts on at least four recent occasions have rejected the Secret Service argument that the logs are not agency records, according to Judicial Watch. The four cases include:

*    Washington Post v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 459 F. Supp 2d 61, 72 (D.D.C. 2006);

*    Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 592 F. Supp. 2d 111, 124 (D.D.C. 2009);

*    Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 527 F. Supp. 2d 76, 89 (D.D.C. 2007); and,

*    Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Security, 459 F. Supp. 2d 61, 71-72 (D.D.C. 2006).

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton explained why his organization filed the suit despite the voluntary publication of the White House last month of some of its visitors logs:

“The courts have affirmed that these White House visitor records are subject to release under FOIA law. If the Obama administration is serious about transparency, they will agree to the release of these records under the Freedom of Information Act. The recent ‘party crasher’ scandal at the White House put the spotlight on the need for transparency under law when it comes to who visits the White House.”

For more on the Judicial Watch case, go here.

 

Barack ObamaBeltway ConfidentialPoliticsUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Deputy public defender Chris Garcia outside the Hall of Justice on Wednesday, June 16, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner)
As pandemic wanes, SF public defender hopes clients will get ‘their day in court’

Like other attorneys in San Francisco, Deputy Public Defender Chris Garcia has… Continue reading

Hyphen hosts a group show at Space Gallery in San Francisco in 2010. (Photo courtesy of Albert Law/Pork Belly Studio)
What’s in a name? Asian American magazine fights to keep its identity

An investor-backed media group laid claim to the moniker of SF’s long-running Hyphen magazine, sparking a conversation about writing over community history

A warning notice sits under the windshield wiper of a recreational vehicle belonging to a homeless man named David as it sits parked on De Wolf Street near Alemany Boulevard on Friday, Aug. 31, 2018. A proposed SF Municipal Transportation Agency law would make it illegal for overnight parking on the side street for vehicles taller than seven feet or longer than 22 feet. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Fight over ‘poverty tows’ heats up

‘What can we do to ensure the vehicle stays in the hands of the owner?’

Crab fisherman Skip Ward of Marysville casts his crab net out off a pier near Fort Point. (Craig Lee/Special to The	Examiner)
San Francisco came back to life, and we captured it all

Last spring, in the early days of the pandemic, the bestselling authors… Continue reading

Revelers at Madrone Art Bar in the early hours of June 15, 2021 (Courtesy Power Quevedo).
No social distancing at Motown-themed dance party

‘I don’t care how anyone feels, I just want to dance!’

Most Read