Hoyer suggests freezing military salaries, but what about his lavish benefits?

Losing the majority was probably not enough to make House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., feel unliked, which would explain why he went so far as to suggest that military pay ought to be frozen too. But Hoyer has a salary of $193,400 (not including benefits) while the average military salary is about $53,000 a year. And in January, The Examiner reported that were he to retire this year, he would receive a defined-pension benefit of around $136,541 annually — about 70 percent of his current salary, but still more than twice the average military salary. The pension would also increase every year with adjustments for cost-of-living. That's not to mention the perks Hoyer gets to enjoy such as publicly and privately funded travel for himself and his office.

Here's his quote:

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said including the military would have  increased savings and add “an element of fairness.” He made the comments  in a statement about he president's announcement of a two-year pay  freeze.

“While I appreciate that the president reduced the length of his  proposed pay freeze from three to two years,” Hoyer said in a statement,  “it would have produced significantly more savings had that sacrifice  been shared between federal civilian and military personnel – with a  strong exception for the members of our military and civilian employees  risking their lives on our behalf in Afghanistan, Iraq, and anywhere  else they are serving in harm's way.”

According to Legistorm, Hoyer's most recent salary was six figures, nearly four times that of the average military salary. Meanwhile, since 2000, he has taken privately-funded trips totaling more than $55,000, which itself is more than the average military salary. His office has enjoyed hundreds of thousands of dollars of privately funded travel — $240,716 to be according to Legistorm records.

While not paid for by taxpayers, the trips did come from a variety of special interests and show that Hoyer's not exactly wanting for resources. The American Israel Education Foundation spent about $10,000 each on Hoyer and several staffers for attending “meetings and tours to learn more about the U.S.-Israel relationship.” Swedish-based SAAB provided nearly $7,000 to fly a Hoyer staffer around to “learn more about the Swedish defense industry.” (Read this report on “elite Swedish commandos” blowing up the wrong house.) The Securities Industry Association paid $3,000 for a Hoyer staffer to participate in a panel.

The Examiner called Hoyer's office to obtain travel details of official trips paid for by taxpayer dollars, but has not yet had that call returned. Taxpayers foot the bill for travel between every member's district and Washington, but there is no database that compiles the trips, leaving disclosure to individual office expense reports.

As for Hoyer's pension, David Freddoso wrote in January:

Members who took office before 1984 get the best deal — a generous 2.5 percent of the average of their top three years' salary for each year of service. Their total includes years of military and other government service. Although the payout in the first year of retirement is limited to 80 percent of their last year's salary, it grows automatically each year with the cost of living. … To get that kind of deal in retirement, you would need at least $2 million in your 401(k) and a healthy bull market from now until you die.

While Hoyer's statement was meant to suggest that the pay freeze for federal workers could be seen as unfair, the fact that Hoyer has enjoyed such benefits because of his position in Congress shows the widening chasm between the political class and those they are supposed to serve. Perhaps if he's looking for “an element of fairness” he ought to offer to reduce the burden his pension and salary places on taxpayers.

Beltway ConfidentialUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Gov. Gavin Newsom, show here speaking at the City College of San Francisco mass vaccination site in April, faces a recall election due to anger on the right over his handling of the pandemic, among other issues. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Why Gavin Newsom’s popularity could work against him in the recall election

Top pollster: ‘We’re not seeing the Democrats engaged in this election. And that may be a problem…’

Passengers ride the 14-Mission Muni bus on Friday, March 12, 2021. (Jordi Molina/Special to S.F. Examiner)
Transit officials fear Free Muni pilot could hurt already-strained service levels

Supporters say fare cuts could increase ridership, help low-income residents

The vacant property at 730 Stanyan St. in the Haight currently houses a safe sleeping site for the homeless. <ins>(Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)</ins>
Affordable housing project on former McDonald’s site delayed as city adds units

The start of construction on an affordable housing project on the site… Continue reading

Visitors read a notice hanging on the Polk Street entrance to City Hall on Thursday, March 26, 2020, shortly after the building was closed. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
City Hall reopening to the public on June 7 after long closure due to COVID-19

San Francisco will reopen City Hall to the public on June 7… Continue reading

Historic streetcars are undergoing testing on The Embarcadero to prepare for their return to service on May 15.<ins></ins>
What to expect for Muni Metro’s relaunch on May 15

Significant service restoration includes downtown subway tunnels and historic streetcars

Most Read