President Donald Trump arrives on Capitol Hill on Thursday to speak to the House Republican Conference. (Chris Kleponis/CNP/Zuma Press/TNS)

House passes its tax plan as Senate version comes under new attack

WASHINGTON — House Republicans approved their sweeping tax-cut package Thursday, setting up a showdown with the Senate, where Republicans are struggling to take a different approach.

Shortly before the House vote, President Donald Trump arrived on Capitol Hill to bolster Republicans determined to push the tax package through Congress — and accomplish a top GOP priority — despite criticism the benefits would flow mostly to corporations and the wealthy, rather than middle-class Americans.

Democrats were unified against the plan, and the only GOP defections in the House came mostly from lawmakers in the Northeast and California, who were concerned about the plan’s limits on deductions for state and local income taxes important to their districts.

The vote was 227-205, with 13 Republicans opposed.

“Passing this bill is the single biggest thing we can do to grow the economy, restore opportunity and help these middle-income families that are struggling,” said House Speaker Paul D. Ryan.

Approval sets Republicans in the House and Senate on a collision course, despite having the majority in both chambers, as they rush to finish the package by Christmas. The Senate plan has key differences and is facing greater hurdles for passage.

A report Thursday by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation said low-income earners, those making less than $30,000 a year, would pay more in taxes starting in 2021 under a revised Senate Republican bill.

By 2023, people with incomes between $30,000 and $40,000 also would see tax increases.

All other income categories — including those earning more than $1 million a year — would see tax decreases through 2025, according to the report.

By 2027, all income categories would face tax increases because the Senate Republican bill calls for tax cuts and other changes to the individual code to expire at the end of 2025.

Both bills use a similar framework, centered on corporate tax cut, from 35 percent to 20 percent, that will be permanent. But the proposed individual tax brackets are starkly different in the two plans, and cuts will expire in eight years under the Senate’s bill.

The plans further diverge over how to pay for the package within rules that allow for no more than $1.5 trillion of additional deficit spending.

The Senate plan fully repeals a popular write-off — state and local tax deductions — bringing in more than $1 trillion over the decade. The House bill kept property tax deductions, capped at $10,000, to win over New York and New Jersey Republicans.

De mocrats lambasted the package as essentially gutting essential tax breaks to give corporations and the wealthy tax cuts.

The House bill ends student loan interest deductions and medical expense deductions, and caps the mortgage interest deduction to loans of $500,000, repealing the write-off for second homes.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi drew on the teachings of historic and religious figures to warn Republicans off legislation that she said benefits the wealthy and “preys on the middle class.”

“It pillages and loots the middle class. It is a shameful piece of legislation,” Pelosi said ahead of the vote. “This is a defining moment.”

Just Posted

Faced with safety fears in Chinese community, Breed pins blame on Board of Supervisors

San Francisco’s Chinese community is deeply worried about crime, and Mayor London… Continue reading

Jurors replaced and deliberations set to begin again in Ghost Ship trial

Three jurors have been dismissed Monday in the trial of Ghost Ship… Continue reading

Suspect in Embarcadero attack surrenders to authorities on new allegations

Austin James Vincent has landed at the center of a battle over plans to build a homeless shelter

Rocks off! Rolling Stones sound great in Santa Clara

No Filter tour serves up classic hits

Gov. Gavin Newsom signs bill setting new standards for police use of force

Here’s how ‘Stephon Clark’s law’ sets California rules

Most Read