For 15 ‘pro-life’ Dems, Obamacare vote did indeed have consequences

Fifteen of 20 self-described “pro-life” congressman who voted for President Obama’s health care reform bill went down to defeat Tuesday and the Alexandria-based Susan B. Anthony List credits its $3.4 million “Votes Have Consequences” project for helping to expose voting records at odds with their political rhetoric.

Project director Marilyn Musgrave told The Examiner that right after the health care bill passed in March, the group started “targeting a number of people who campaigned as pro-life, with pro-life voting records, but then caved in on the big one.”

The group takes credit for forcing the retirement of Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., author of an amendment to ban the use of any federal funding for abortions in the health care bill, and Rep. Alan Mollohan, D-W.Va., who lost his primary earlier this year.

Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper, D-Penn., Rep. Brad Ellsworth, D-Ind., and Rep. Steve Driehaus, D-Ohio, went down to defeat in Tuesday’s mid-term election. All five voted for Stupak’s amendment, but then turned around and voted for final passage after the Stupak amendment had been stripped out and President Obama promised to replace it with an executive order instead.

The List supported Rep. Dan Lipinski, D-Ill. – the lone member of the Stupak Coalition to vote against the health care bill because of its abortion provisions – who retained his seat.

Musgrave, a former elected official, says the  highlight of the evening was the defeat of Driehaus, who filed a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission for what he claimed was a “false statement” about a political candidate during an election cycle in violation of state law. The three-member panel found “probable cause “for the case to move forward.

“The defeat of a member of the U.S. Congress who tried to hide behind a elections commission to oppose what we were saying and limit our free speech was notable,” Musgrave added.

Beltway ConfidentialObamacarePresident ObamaUS

Just Posted

Dreamforce returned to San Francisco in person this week – but with a tiny sliver of past attendance. PHOTO COURTESY SALESFORCE
Dreamforce returns with hundreds on hand, down from 170,000 in the past

High hopes for a larger Salesforce conference shriveled during the summer

The numbers show nearly 14 percent of San Francisco voters who participated in the Sept. 14 recall election wanted to oust Gov. Gavin Newsom from elected office. (Shutterstock photo)
(Shutterstock photo)
How San Francisco neighborhoods voted in the Newsom recall

Sunset tops the list as the area with the most ‘yes’ votes

Alison Collins, a member of the San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education, listens during a board meeting. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Alison Collins speaks: Embattled SF school board member confronts the recall effort

‘It’s important for folks to know what this recall is about. It’s bigger than any one of us.’

Is the Black Cat incident a distraction from the recovery of The City’s storied nightlife industry or does Mayor London Breed’s behavior inadvertently highlight the predicament the industry’s been in since San Francisco reinstated indoor mask requirements on Aug. 20?<ins> (Kevin N. Hume/The Examiner, 2021)</ins>
Club owners to maskless mayor: Are we the new fun police?

Black Cat affair highlights difficult recovery for nightlife industry

Passengers board a BART train at Powell Street station on Friday, Oct. 23, 2020. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Powell Station death serves as a grim reminder. BART doors don’t stop for anyone

What you need to know about safety sensors on the trains

Most Read