Earmarks as corruption fuel

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that earmarks are a tiny portion of the federal budget, and that even if Republicans stopped earmarking, the bottom line on spending bills might not change.

But Sen. Jim DeMint is also correct that earmarks are a gateway drug to political corruption, or at least compromising one’s principles. In other words, the reason to oppose earmarks — or at least call for serious reform of them — is to clean up the culture of Congress.

The Hill has a great piece today illustrating that theme.

Lobbyists who have built their careers around securing congressional money for clients are facing the biggest squeeze yet on their business as earmarks begin to disappear from Washington.

The lobbyists in the article all say they will adapt, but it seems clear that ending earmarks would impose a marginal downward pressure on lobbying — which is a good thing.

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

Homeless swept from Polk Street alley despite lack of shelter beds

On one of the first rainy days of the fall season, San… Continue reading

SF prosecutors ‘step aside’ as federal case moves to trial in Kate Steinle shooting

A years-long legal battle that garnered the attention of President Donald Trump… Continue reading

Rooftop park the latest point of conflict between Muni and Central Subway contractor

Bills, bills, bills. They’re a common household headache, but on the $1.6… Continue reading

New skyscraper to rise in city’s skyline

A proposed 800-foot tower could soon rise in downtown San Francisco’s rapidly… Continue reading

Most Read