Don't tread on my television

Perhaps you haven't heard about California's big screen television ban. This plan has been hatched by the unelected California Energy Commission, which will decide on Nov. 18 whether to ban the sale of many electricity-guzzling large-screen plasma televisions. On its website, CEC claims:

No, the state is not banning any type of TV. Consumers have the freedom to choose any type and size of television that meets the efficiency standard.

This is bureaucrat-speak for, “Yes, we are banning all televisions that don't meet the efficiency standard.”

The ban will affect plasma sets that tend to be more affordable but use more energy than the more expensive LCD models. CEC estimates that after buying a more expensive set, California consumers will save, at most, about $30 per year in electricity costs. As with many of the Obama administration's plans on the federal level (the “green economy” and health care, for example), the idea here is to help people save money in the very, very long run by front-loading many large costs at a time when consumers and taxpayers can least afford it.

California's decision could compel manufacturers to limit consumers' choices nationwide. Worse still, that possibility has some commentators calling for new national television legislation that would pre-empt state regulations. (There are still no plans for a Flatscreen Czar in the Obama administration, but don't be surprised when it happens.)

American voters frown upon this sort of regulatory intrusion, according to Rasmussen Reports. Specifically, they oppose the plasma prohibition by a 50-point margin — 66 percent opposed and only 16 percent in favor.

If California's crusade against the plasma consumer starts a trend, it might just be a trend of electing conservatives to office.

Beltway ConfidentialUS

If you find our journalism valuable and relevant, please consider joining our Examiner membership program.
Find out more at www.sfexaminer.com/join/

Just Posted

San Francisco plans to reopen the Upper Great Highway, which had been closed for recreational use during the COVID pandemic. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
San Francisco plans to reopen the Upper Great Highway, which had been closed for recreational use during the COVID pandemic. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
San Francisco plans to reopen the Upper Great Highway, which had been closed for recreational use during the COVID pandemic. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
Great Highway to reopen on weekdays, sparking renewed debate

The Upper Great Highway soon will reopen to vehicles for the first… Continue reading

Second grader Genesis Ulloa leads students in an after-school community hub in a game at the Mission YMCA on Friday, May 7, 2021. (Kevin N. Hume/S.F. Examiner)
SF parents face school year with hope, trepidation and concern

‘Honestly, I don’t know how I’m going to deal with it’

A fire lookout with the U.S. Forest Service feeds a chipmunk in the Tahoe National Forest. California officials closed some popular trails and nature areas in South Lake Tahoe for the week after a dead chipmunk tested positive for the plague. (Jim Wilson/The New York Times)
Yes, Lake Tahoe chipmunks have the plague. But don’t worry (too much)

By Johnny Diaz New York Times When California officials closed parts of… Continue reading

After nearly 15 years of being part of Google, the most successful money machine in internet history, it’s still not clear that YouTube has fulfilled its financial potential both for itself and everyone involved in its vast digital economy. (Dani Choi/The New York Times)
Is YouTube a success? It’s a serious question

By Shira Ovide New York Times This question will sound ridiculous, but… Continue reading

Most Read